Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DIVO vs MAGY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year MAGY paid 26.5% of its price in cash against DIVO’s 6.8%, though DIVO returned more with it reinvested.

Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF.

6.8%DIVO cash paid, 1 year
26.5%MAGY cash paid, 1 year
+14.6%DIVO total return, 1 year
+1.8%MAGY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: DIVO scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

DIVO 67.3MAGY 22.63.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

DIVO2 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%DIVO+14.6%6.8% of it arrived as cash2 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%DIVO+14.6%2 pts behind SPY
MAGY9.4 pts behind MAGS · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
MAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGSTotal return, distributions reinvestedMAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGS

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DIVO and MAGY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in DIVOOnly in MAGY
Microsoft Corp 5.97%Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.02%
Apple Inc 5.49%First American Government Obligations Fu 0.36%
Caterpillar Inc 5.34%MAGS 09/25/2026 71.37 C -0.38%
Visa Inc 5.15%
Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 12 5.02%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 4.90%
Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 4.76%
Amgen Inc 4.74%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

DIVO and MAGY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
DIVOMAGYDIVOMAGYDIVOMAGY
3 months+4.5%+3.7%1.2%6.1%+2.3 pts−3.9 pts
6 months+9.4%+8.1%2.5%12.9%−8.6 pts−12.7 pts
1 year+14.6%+1.8%6.8%26.5%−2.0 pts−9.4 pts
3 years+56.1%not published19.1%not published−22.3 ptsnot published
Since launch+218.8%+25.6%72.4%42.0%−76.3 pts−37.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DIVO and MAGY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
Dividend stocks with call overlay on SPY, paying monthly
MAGY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF
Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly
IssuerAmplifyRoundhill
Strategydividend stocks with call overlaycovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)Magnificent Seven (MAGS)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized4.9%19.2%
Expense ratio0.56%0.99%
Cash paid, 1 year6.8%26.5%
Price change, 1 year+7.3%−25.3%
Total return, 1 year+14.6%+1.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+11.2%
Ahead or behind−2.0 pts−9.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age3565 days513 days
Net assets$7.8bn$102m

DIVO in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DIVO paid 6.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 7.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.9%, paid monthly.

MAGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.2%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, DIVO or MAGY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DIVO paid 6.8% of its starting price in cash and MAGY paid 26.5%, so MAGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, DIVO or MAGY?
With every distribution reinvested, DIVO returned +14.6% and MAGY returned +1.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so DIVO returned more.
Which is cheaper, DIVO or MAGY?
DIVO charges 0.56% a year and MAGY charges 0.99%, so DIVO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DIVO against MAGY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DIVO against MAGY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/divo-vs-magy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources