Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BIGY vs MAGY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year MAGY paid 26.5% of its price in cash against BIGY’s 12.5%, though BIGY returned more with it reinvested.

YieldMax(R) Target 12(TM) Big 50 Option Income ETF and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF.

12.5%BIGY cash paid, 1 year
26.5%MAGY cash paid, 1 year
+13.0%BIGY total return, 1 year
+1.8%MAGY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: BIGY scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

BIGY 52.6MAGY 22.63.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

BIGY3.6 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%BIGY+13.0%12.5% of it arrived as cash3.6 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%BIGY+13.0%12.5% as cash3.6 pts behind SPY
MAGY9.4 pts behind MAGS · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
MAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGSTotal return, distributions reinvestedMAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGS

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BIGY and MAGY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in BIGYOnly in MAGY
NVIDIA Corp 6.30%Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.02%
Apple Inc 6.13%First American Government Obligations Fu 0.36%
Alphabet Inc 5.61%MAGS 09/25/2026 71.37 C -0.38%
Amazon.com Inc 5.45%
Broadcom Inc 3.73%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.59%
Microsoft Corp 3.35%
Walmart Inc 3.32%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

BIGY and MAGY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
BIGYMAGYBIGYMAGYBIGYMAGY
3 months+2.6%+3.7%3.0%6.1%+0.3 pts−3.9 pts
6 months+15.0%+8.1%6.9%12.9%−3.0 pts−12.7 pts
1 year+13.0%+1.8%12.5%26.5%−3.6 pts−9.4 pts
Since launch+28.9%+25.6%21.8%42.0%−2.4 pts−37.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BIGY and MAGY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BIGY
YieldMax(R) Target 12(TM) Big 50 Option Income ETF
Synthetic covered call on SPY, paying monthly
MAGY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF
Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly
IssuerYieldMaxRoundhill
Strategysynthetic covered callcovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxyMagnificent Seven (MAGS)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized12.1%19.2%
Expense ratio1.09%0.99%
Cash paid, 1 year12.5%26.5%
Price change, 1 year−0.3%−25.3%
Total return, 1 year+13.0%+1.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+11.2%
Ahead or behind−3.6 pts−9.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate0%not published
Age666 days513 days
Net assets$33m$102m

BIGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BIGY paid 12.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.0%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.1%, paid monthly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

MAGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.2%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, BIGY or MAGY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BIGY paid 12.5% of its starting price in cash and MAGY paid 26.5%, so MAGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, BIGY or MAGY?
With every distribution reinvested, BIGY returned +13.0% and MAGY returned +1.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so BIGY returned more.
Which is cheaper, BIGY or MAGY?
BIGY charges 1.09% a year and MAGY charges 0.99%, so MAGY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BIGY against MAGY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BIGY against MAGY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bigy-vs-magy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources