Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

PCOV vs QRMI: which paid, and which earned it?

PCOV and QRMI both write options for income.

Principal Equity Premium Income ETF and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF.

0.0%PCOV cash paid, 1 year
11.8%QRMI cash paid, 1 year
−3.7%PCOV total return, 1 year
+8.5%QRMI total return, 1 year
PCOV3 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY−0.7%PCOV−3.7%3 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY−0.7%PCOV−3.7%3 pts behind SPY
QRMI13.3 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QRMI+8.5%11.8% of it arrived as cash13.3 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QRMI+8.5%13.3 pts behind QQQ

Performance, window by window

PCOV and QRMI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
PCOVQRMIPCOVQRMIPCOVQRMI
3 monthsnot published+0.6%not published3.0%not published+3.1 pts
6 monthsnot published+7.3%not published6.1%not published−17.0 pts
1 yearnot published+8.5%not published11.8%not published−13.3 pts
3 yearsnot published+26.7%not published33.5%not published−71.5 pts
Since launch−3.7%+10.4%0.0%40.8%−3.0 pts−89.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
PCOV and QRMI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PCOV
Principal Equity Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SPY
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
IssuerPrincipalGlobal X
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysnot establishedmonthly
Payout rate, annualizednot published12.0%
Expense ratio0.34%0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year0.0% (since launch on Aug 19, 2026)11.8%
Price change, 1 year−3.7%−3.8%
Total return, 1 year−3.7% (since launch on Aug 19, 2026)+8.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year−0.7%+21.8%
Ahead or behind−3.0 pts−13.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published100%
Age30 days1849 days
Net assetsnot published$15m

PCOV in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 19, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, PCOV paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −0.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.0 pts.

QRMI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QRMI paid 11.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.0%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, PCOV or QRMI?
PCOV charges 0.34% a year and QRMI charges 0.60%, so PCOV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PCOV against QRMI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PCOV against QRMI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/pcov-vs-qrmi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources