Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

FGSI vs MAGY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year MAGY paid 26.5% of its price in cash against FGSI’s 8.1%, though FGSI returned more with it reinvested.

FT Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF.

8.1%FGSI cash paid, 1 year
26.5%MAGY cash paid, 1 year
+5.3%FGSI total return, 1 year
+1.8%MAGY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: FGSI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

FGSI 33MAGY 22.63.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

FGSI11.3 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%FGSI+5.3%8.1% of it arrived as cash11.3 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%FGSI+5.3%11.3 pts behind SPY
MAGY9.4 pts behind MAGS · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
MAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGSTotal return, distributions reinvestedMAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGS

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FGSI and MAGY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in FGSIOnly in MAGY
Newmont Corporation 2.70%Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.02%
Palantir Technologies Inc. (Class A) 2.63%First American Government Obligations Fu 0.36%
Marvell Technology, Inc. 2.53%MAGS 09/25/2026 71.37 C -0.38%
Microsoft Corporation 2.45%
Arista Networks, Inc. 2.32%
DexCom, Inc. 2.28%
Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 2.22%
Target Corporation 2.22%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

FGSI and MAGY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
FGSIMAGYFGSIMAGYFGSIMAGY
3 months+2.4%+3.7%2.1%6.1%+0.2 pts−3.9 pts
6 months+10.0%+8.1%4.4%12.9%−8.0 pts−12.7 pts
1 year+5.3%+1.8%8.1%26.5%−11.3 pts−9.4 pts
Since launch+11.9%+25.6%9.8%42.0%−14.3 pts−37.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
FGSI and MAGY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FGSI
FT Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
MAGY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF
Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly
IssuerFirst TrustRoundhill
Strategyoption incomecovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxyMagnificent Seven (MAGS)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized8.6%19.2%
Expense ratio0.85%0.99%
Cash paid, 1 year8.1%26.5%
Price change, 1 year−3.2%−25.3%
Total return, 1 year+5.3%+1.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+11.2%
Ahead or behind−11.3 pts−9.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age449 days513 days
Net assets$2m$102m

FGSI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FGSI paid 8.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.6%, paid monthly.

MAGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.2%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, FGSI or MAGY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FGSI paid 8.1% of its starting price in cash and MAGY paid 26.5%, so MAGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, FGSI or MAGY?
With every distribution reinvested, FGSI returned +5.3% and MAGY returned +1.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so FGSI returned more.
Which is cheaper, FGSI or MAGY?
FGSI charges 0.85% a year and MAGY charges 0.99%, so FGSI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FGSI against MAGY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FGSI against MAGY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fgsi-vs-magy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources