Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
MAGY vs XQQI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MAGY and XQQI both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MAGY and XQQI
Net assets: $94m on Nov 4, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF, and $408m on Oct 28, 2026 for NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF.
7.8 pts behind MAGS
MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MAGS
+6.3%
MAGY
−1.5%
7.8 pts behind MAGS
Total return, distributions reinvested
7.8 pts behind MAGS
MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MAGS
+6.3%
MAGY
−1.5%
7.8 pts behind MAGS
24.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.4.9 pts behind QQQ
XQQI since launch: paid 17.0%, price −9.2%, total +7.7%, QQQ +12.6%, −4.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQ
+12.6%
XQQI
+7.7%
17.0% of it arrived as cash
4.9 pts behind QQQ
Total return, distributions reinvested
4.9 pts behind QQQ
XQQI since launch: paid 17.0%, price −9.2%, total +7.7%, QQQ +12.6%, −4.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQ
+12.6%
XQQI
+7.7%
17.0% cash
4.9 pts behind QQQ
17.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. XQQI since launch: paid 17.0%, price −9.2%, total +7.7%, QQQ +12.6%, −4.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
XQQI costs 0.01 points a year less; XQQI is 4.3 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | MAGY | XQQI |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.5% | not published |
| Price change | fell 26.1% (1 year) | fell 9.2% (since Feb 3, 2026) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment | 100% of the Oct 9, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Magnificent Seven, measured through MAGS | Nasdaq-100, measured through QQQ |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.99% | 0.98% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 28, 2026 | $95m | $408m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, MAGY and XQQI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | MAGY | XQQI | MAGY | XQQI | MAGY | XQQI |
| 3 months | +4.0% | −4.1% | 5.4% | 5.0% | +1.2 pts | −0.6 pts |
| 6 months | +0.8% | −3.0% | 11.3% | 10.0% | −1.8 pts | −2.6 pts |
| 1 year | −1.5% | – | 24.0% | – | −7.8 pts | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: MAGY Apr 2025 · XQQI Feb 2026 | +25.7% | +7.7% | 44.0% | 17.0% | −37.0 pts | −4.9 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
MAGY
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 26.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.5%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +6.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.1%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
XQQI
Over the period from its first trade on Feb 3, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, XQQI paid 17.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 9.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.9 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.2%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 9, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MAGY against XQQI, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-xqqi
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). MAGY against XQQI. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-xqqi
[MAGY against XQQI (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-xqqi)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.