Data as of .
QVOL vs XQQI: which paid, and which earned it?
QVOL and XQQI both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QVOL and XQQI hold 69% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | QVOL | XQQI |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 8.53% | 8.70% |
| Microsoft Corp | 5.05% | 5.94% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 4.53% | 5.12% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 7.61% | 4.39% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 6.17% | 4.08% |
| Alphabet Inc | 4.70% | 3.28% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 3.14% | 3.27% |
| Alphabet Inc | 4.69% | 3.02% |
| Broadcom Inc | 3.42% | 2.75% |
| Intel Corp | 3.01% | 2.44% |
| Apple Inc | 2.33% | 7.91% |
| Applied Materials Inc | 1.52% | 1.60% |
| Only in QVOL | Only in XQQI |
|---|---|
| Oracle Corp 2.53% | Tesla Inc 3.01% |
| ON Semiconductor Corp 0.64% | Walmart Inc 2.38% |
| GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc 0.59% | Palantir Technologies Inc 1.86% |
| Atlassian Corp 0.33% | Costco Wholesale Corp 1.84% |
| Space Exploration Technologies Corp 1.01% | |
| Linde PLC 0.97% | |
| PepsiCo Inc 0.83% | |
| Gilead Sciences Inc 0.81% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QVOL | XQQI | QVOL | XQQI | QVOL | XQQI | |
| 3 months | −3.7% | −2.7% | 3.0% | 4.8% | −1.2 pts | −0.2 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +21.8% | not published | 11.4% | not published | −2.4 pts |
| Since launch | +4.3% | +14.3% | 4.2% | 13.7% | +2.1 pts | −2.9 pts |
| QVOL Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF Option income on QQQ, paying monthly | XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF Option income on QQQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Infrastructure Capital | NEOS |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 12.6% | 20.5% |
| Expense ratio | 0.82% | 0.98% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 4.2% (since launch on May 12, 2026) | 13.7% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | 0.0% | −0.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.3% (since launch on May 12, 2026) | +14.3% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +2.1% | +17.3% |
| Ahead or behind | +2.1 pts | −2.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 100% |
| Age | 129 days | 227 days |
| Net assets | $8m | $351m |
QVOL in plain words
Over the period since launch on May 12, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, QVOL paid 4.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +2.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.6%, paid monthly.
XQQI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XQQI paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +17.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.5%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Jul 10, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, QVOL or XQQI?
- QVOL charges 0.82% a year and XQQI charges 0.98%, so QVOL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QVOL against XQQI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qvol-vs-xqqi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.