Data as of .
XQQI vs YSPC: which paid, and which earned it?
XQQI and YSPC both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, XQQI and YSPC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in XQQI | Only in YSPC |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 8.70% | United States Treasury Bill 07/08/2027 43.24% |
| Apple Inc 7.91% | United States Treasury Bill 02/18/2027 34.02% |
| Microsoft Corp 5.94% | United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.375% 05/15/2027 16.09% |
| Micron Technology Inc 5.12% | SPCX 10/16/2026 150.01 C 6.39% |
| Amazon.com Inc 4.39% | First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 5.82% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.08% | SPACE EX CLL OPT 09/26 162.500 0.62% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.28% | SPACE EX CLL OPT 09/26 157.500 0.07% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.27% | SPACE EX CLL OPT 09/26 152.500 -0.15% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XQQI | YSPC | XQQI | YSPC | XQQI | YSPC | |
| 3 months | −2.7% | not published | 4.8% | not published | −0.2 pts | not published |
| 6 months | +21.8% | not published | 11.4% | not published | −2.4 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +14.3% | +6.4% | 13.7% | 10.9% | −2.9 pts | +5.3 pts |
| XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF Option income on QQQ, paying monthly | YSPC YieldMax(R) [SpaceX] Option Income Strategy ETF Synthetic covered call on SPY, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | NEOS | YieldMax |
| Strategy | option income | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 20.5% | 63.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.98% | 1.01% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 13.7% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) | 10.9% (since launch on Jul 15, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −0.3% | −5.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.3% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) | +6.4% (since launch on Jul 15, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +17.3% | +1.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −2.9 pts | +5.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 100% | 0% |
| Age | 227 days | 65 days |
| Net assets | $351m | $32m |
XQQI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XQQI paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +17.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.5%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Jul 10, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
YSPC in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jul 15, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, YSPC paid 10.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.4%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy returned +1.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 63.0%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, XQQI or YSPC?
- XQQI charges 0.98% a year and YSPC charges 1.01%, so XQQI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, XQQI against YSPC, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/xqqi-vs-yspc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.