Data as of .
XQQI vs YMAG: which paid, and which earned it?
XQQI and YMAG both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, XQQI and YMAG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in XQQI | Only in YMAG |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 8.70% | YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF 14.58% |
| Apple Inc 7.91% | YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF 14.24% |
| Microsoft Corp 5.94% | YieldMax Tsla Option Income ETF 14.21% |
| Micron Technology Inc 5.12% | YieldMax Amzn Option Income ETF 14.11% |
| Amazon.com Inc 4.39% | YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF 14.11% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.08% | YieldMax Meta Option Income Strategy ETF 13.99% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.28% | YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF 13.90% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.27% | First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 0.87% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XQQI | YMAG | XQQI | YMAG | XQQI | YMAG | |
| 3 months | −2.7% | +6.1% | 4.8% | 9.4% | −0.2 pts | −1.6 pts |
| 6 months | +21.8% | +15.4% | 11.4% | 21.1% | −2.4 pts | −5.3 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +9.7% | not published | 35.5% | not published | −1.5 pts |
| Since launch | +14.3% | +70.7% | 13.7% | 89.1% | −2.9 pts | −34.1 pts |
| XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF Option income on QQQ, paying monthly | YMAG YieldMax(R) Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs Synthetic covered call on MAGS, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | NEOS | YieldMax |
| Strategy | option income | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | Magnificent Seven (MAGS) |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 20.5% | 30.9% |
| Expense ratio | 0.98% | 1.34% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 13.7% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) | 35.5% |
| Price change, 1 year | −0.3% | −28.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.3% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) | +9.7% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +17.3% | +11.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −2.9 pts | −1.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 100% | 80% |
| Age | 227 days | 962 days |
| Net assets | $351m | $297m |
XQQI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XQQI paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +17.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.5%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Jul 10, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
YMAG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YMAG paid 35.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 28.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.7%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 30.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 80% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, XQQI or YMAG?
- XQQI charges 0.98% a year and YMAG charges 1.34%, so XQQI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, XQQI against YMAG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/xqqi-vs-ymag Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.