Data as of .
QVOL vs SDVD: which paid, and which earned it?
QVOL and SDVD both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QVOL and SDVD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in QVOL | Only in SDVD |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 8.53% | National HealthCare Corporation 1.12% |
| Amazon.com Inc 7.61% | First BanCorp. 1.04% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 6.17% | OFG Bancorp 1.03% |
| Microsoft Corp 5.05% | The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. 1.01% |
| Alphabet Inc 4.70% | Interparfums, Inc. 1.00% |
| Alphabet Inc 4.69% | Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporat 1.00% |
| Micron Technology Inc 4.53% | VeriSign, Inc. 1.00% |
| Marvell Technology Inc 4.30% | Assurant, Inc. 0.99% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QVOL | SDVD | QVOL | SDVD | QVOL | SDVD | |
| 3 months | −3.7% | −0.1% | 3.0% | 2.1% | −1.2 pts | −6.7 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +8.3% | not published | 4.4% | not published | −4.3 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +10.8% | not published | 9.2% | not published | −16.4 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +53.0% | not published | 30.7% | not published | −0.7 pts |
| Since launch | +4.3% | +47.6% | 4.2% | 29.7% | +2.1 pts | −4.1 pts |
| QVOL Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF Option income on QQQ, paying monthly | SDVD FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Infrastructure Capital | First Trust |
| Strategy | option income | dividend stocks with call overlay |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 12.6% | 8.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.82% | 0.85% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 4.2% (since launch on May 12, 2026) | 9.2% |
| Price change, 1 year | 0.0% | +1.2% |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.3% (since launch on May 12, 2026) | +10.8% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +2.1% | +27.2% |
| Ahead or behind | +2.1 pts | −16.4 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 129 days | 1135 days |
| Net assets | $8m | $888m |
QVOL in plain words
Over the period since launch on May 12, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, QVOL paid 4.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +2.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.6%, paid monthly.
SDVD in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SDVD paid 9.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.8%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 16.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.8%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, QVOL or SDVD?
- QVOL charges 0.82% a year and SDVD charges 0.85%, so QVOL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QVOL against SDVD, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qvol-vs-sdvd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.