Data as of .
MAGY vs ROCQ: which paid, and which earned it?
MAGY and ROCQ both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MAGY and ROCQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in MAGY | Only in ROCQ |
|---|---|
| Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.02% | NVIDIA Corp. 8.37% |
| First American Government Obligations Fu 0.36% | Apple, Inc. 7.12% |
| MAGS 09/25/2026 71.37 C -0.38% | Micron Technology, Inc. 6.70% |
| Alphabet, Inc. 6.30% | |
| Microsoft Corp. 5.03% | |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.74% | |
| Amazon.com, Inc. 4.52% | |
| Lam Research Corp. 4.21% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAGY | ROCQ | MAGY | ROCQ | MAGY | ROCQ | |
| 3 months | +3.7% | 0.0% | 6.1% | 3.0% | −3.9 pts | +2.5 pts |
| 6 months | +8.1% | +20.0% | 12.9% | 5.9% | −12.7 pts | −4.2 pts |
| 1 year | +1.8% | not published | 26.5% | not published | −9.4 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +25.6% | +18.0% | 42.0% | 5.8% | −37.5 pts | −4.0 pts |
| MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly | ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Roundhill | JPMorgan |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Magnificent Seven (MAGS) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 19.2% | 10.6% |
| Expense ratio | 0.99% | not published |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 26.5% | 5.8% (since launch on Mar 19, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −25.3% | +12.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | +1.8% | +18.0% (since launch on Mar 19, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +11.2% | +21.9% |
| Ahead or behind | −9.4 pts | −4.0 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 513 days | 183 days |
| Net assets | $102m | $629m |
MAGY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.2%, paid weekly.
ROCQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Mar 19, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ROCQ paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 12.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.0%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.6%, paid monthly.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGY against ROCQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-rocq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.