Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
MAGY vs QDTE: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QDTE paid 34.7% of its price in cash against MAGY’s 24.0%, and returned more with it reinvested.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MAGY and QDTE
Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $94m for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF and $881m for Roundhill Nasdaq-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF.
7.8 pts behind MAGS
MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MAGS
+6.3%
MAGY
−1.5%
7.8 pts behind MAGS
Total return, distributions reinvested
7.8 pts behind MAGS
MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MAGS
+6.3%
MAGY
−1.5%
7.8 pts behind MAGS
24.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.1.4 pts ahead of QQQ
QDTE over 1 year: paid 34.7%, price −23.4%, total +13.7%, QQQ +12.3%, +1.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQ
+12.3%
QDTE
+13.7%
34.7% of it arrived as cash
1.4 pts ahead of QQQ
Total return, distributions reinvested
1.4 pts ahead of QQQ
QDTE over 1 year: paid 34.7%, price −23.4%, total +13.7%, QQQ +12.3%, +1.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQ
+12.3%
QDTE
+13.7%
34.7% as cash
1.4 pts ahead of QQQ
34.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QDTE over 1 year: paid 34.7%, price −23.4%, total +13.7%, QQQ +12.3%, +1.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
QDTE costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.2 points; QDTE is 9.4 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | MAGY | QDTE |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.5% | +13.7% |
| Price change, 1 year | fell 26.1% | fell 23.4% |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment | 100% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Magnificent Seven, measured through MAGS | Nasdaq-100, measured through QQQ |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.99% | 0.96% |
| Net assets | $94m | $881m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed
One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →
Risk and return
May 2, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · 78 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: MAGY against MAGS, May 2, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026; QDTE against QQQ, Mar 15, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026.
From May 2025 to Oct 2026, QDTE returned more: +44.5% to +17.1%. MAGY swung slightly less: 15.0% to 16.2%. QDTE fell less at its worst: −8.2% to −13.4%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | MAGY | QDTE | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +17.1% | +44.5% | QDTE | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +11.1% | +27.8% | QDTE | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −25.8% | −17.3% | QDTE | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 15.0% | 16.2% | MAGY (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 11.4% | 9.9% | QDTE | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −13.4% | −8.2% | QDTE | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 48.4% | 81.9% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 84.4% | 91.4% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 0.60 | 0.85 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.81 | 0.93 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.52 | 1.36 | QDTE | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.68 | 2.22 | QDTE | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.128 | 0.172 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.83 | 3.40 | QDTE | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | MAGS | QQQ | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −6.3% a year | +1.1% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −1.16 | 0.37 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −17.0% to +4.5% | −4.8% to +7.1% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | −1.40 | −0.22 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 11.0% | 5.7% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 78 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, MAGY and QDTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | MAGY | QDTE | MAGY | QDTE | MAGY | QDTE |
| 3 months | +4.0% | −1.6% | 5.4% | 6.3% | +1.2 pts | +1.8 pts |
| 6 months | +0.8% | +1.6% | 11.3% | 14.3% | −1.8 pts | +2.0 pts |
| 1 year | −1.5% | +13.7% | 24.0% | 34.7% | −7.8 pts | +1.5 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: MAGY Apr 2025 · QDTE Mar 2024 | +25.7% | +55.2% | 44.0% | 75.6% | −37.0 pts | −2.3 pts |
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
MAGY
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 26.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.5%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +6.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.1%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
QDTE
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QDTE paid 34.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 23.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 27.9%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MAGY against QDTE, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-qdte
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). MAGY against QDTE. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-qdte
[MAGY against QDTE (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-qdte)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.