Data as of .
OARK vs QDTE: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year OARK paid 38.6% of its price in cash against QDTE’s 36.8%, though QDTE returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QDTE scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 161 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, OARK and QDTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in OARK | Only in QDTE |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 37.81% | NDX 03/19/2027 2510.15 C 26.01% |
| TREASURY BILL 30.32% | 4NDX US 12/18/26 C2450.1 FLX 25.19% |
| TREASURY BILL 18.55% | NDX 06/11/2027 3059.42 C 22.18% |
| TREASURY BILL 10.80% | 4NDX US 09/18/26 C2250 FLX 18.27% |
| TREASURY BILL 2.51% | Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 5.05% |
| First American Government Obligations Fu 3.30% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OARK | QDTE | OARK | QDTE | OARK | QDTE | |
| 3 months | +5.1% | +1.0% | 9.6% | 7.8% | +5.9 pts | +1.8 pts |
| 6 months | +15.3% | +16.9% | 22.6% | 15.9% | −5.4 pts | −3.8 pts |
| 1 year | +7.2% | +22.3% | 38.6% | 36.8% | −15.8 pts | −0.7 pts |
| 3 years | +48.6% | not published | 82.9% | not published | −46.5 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +53.5% | +58.3% | 89.2% | 73.8% | −99.6 pts | −4.3 pts |
| OARK YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF Synthetic covered call on QQQ, paying weekly | QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF 0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | YieldMax | Roundhill |
| Strategy | synthetic covered call | 0DTE covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | weekly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 37.1% | 24.3% |
| Expense ratio | 1.00% | 0.96% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 38.6% | 36.8% |
| Price change, 1 year | −33.3% | −18.5% |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.2% | +22.3% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +23.0% | +23.0% |
| Ahead or behind | −15.8 pts | −0.7 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 39% | not published |
| Age | 1388 days | 918 days |
OARK in plain words
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, OARK paid 38.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 33.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 15.8 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 37.1%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 39% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
QDTE in plain words
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, QDTE paid 36.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 18.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 24.3%, paid weekly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, OARK or QDTE?
- Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, OARK paid 38.6% of its starting price in cash and QDTE paid 36.8%, so OARK paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, OARK or QDTE?
- With every distribution reinvested, OARK returned +7.2% and QDTE returned +22.3% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so QDTE returned more.
- Which is cheaper, OARK or QDTE?
- OARK charges 1.00% a year and QDTE charges 0.96%, so QDTE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, OARK against QDTE, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/oark-vs-qdte Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.