Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ACKY vs QDTE: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QDTE paid 36.1% of its price in cash against ACKY’s 13.9%, and returned more with it reinvested.

VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Distribution ETF and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF.

13.9%ACKY cash paid, 1 year
36.1%QDTE cash paid, 1 year
−1.3%ACKY total return, 1 year
+21.1%QDTE total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QDTE scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

ACKY 12.7QDTE 39.93.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

ACKY17.9 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%ACKY−1.3%17.9 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%ACKY−1.3%17.9 pts behind SPY
QDTE0.7 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QDTE+21.1%36.1% of it arrived as cash0.7 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QDTE+21.1%36.1% as cash0.7 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACKY and QDTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in ACKYOnly in QDTE
Microsoft Corp 11.56%NDX 03/19/2027 2510.15 C 25.90%
Brookfield Corp 11.16%QQQ 11/19/2027 70.11 C 24.77%
Uber Technologies Inc 10.74%NDX 06/11/2027 3059.42 C 22.64%
Pershing Square USA Ltd 10.50%QQQ 09/17/2027 70.69 C 17.82%
Meta Platforms Inc 10.23%Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 4.97%
Amazon.com Inc 9.95%First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 3.90%
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc 8.86%
Restaurant Brands International Inc 8.22%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

ACKY and QDTE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
ACKYQDTEACKYQDTEACKYQDTE
3 months+0.8%−0.9%3.7%7.6%−1.5 pts+1.6 pts
6 months+5.8%+19.7%7.7%16.2%−12.2 pts−4.5 pts
1 year−1.3%+21.1%13.9%36.1%−17.9 pts−0.7 pts
Since launch−0.4%+59.9%14.0%74.1%−19.1 pts−4.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ACKY and QDTE on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACKY
VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Distribution ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
QDTE
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
IssuerVistaSharesRoundhill
Strategycovered call0DTE covered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxyNasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized15.7%20.8%
Expense ratio0.95%0.96%
Cash paid, 1 year13.9%36.1%
Price change, 1 year−15.1%−19.2%
Total return, 1 year−1.3%+21.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+21.8%
Ahead or behind−17.9 pts−0.7 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age374 days925 days
Net assets$45m$967m

ACKY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, ACKY paid 13.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 15.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 17.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.7%, paid monthly.

QDTE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTE paid 36.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 19.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.8%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, ACKY or QDTE?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, ACKY paid 13.9% of its starting price in cash and QDTE paid 36.1%, so QDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, ACKY or QDTE?
With every distribution reinvested, ACKY returned −1.3% and QDTE returned +21.1% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QDTE returned more.
Which is cheaper, ACKY or QDTE?
ACKY charges 0.95% a year and QDTE charges 0.96%, so ACKY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACKY against QDTE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACKY against QDTE, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acky-vs-qdte Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources