Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QDTE vs RECI: which paid, and which earned it?

QDTE and RECI both write options for income.

Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF and Columbia Research Enhanced Core Premium Income ETF.

36.1%QDTE cash paid, 1 year
0.7%RECI cash paid, 1 year
+21.1%QDTE total return, 1 year
+2.4%RECI total return, 1 year
QDTE0.7 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QDTE+21.1%36.1% of it arrived as cash0.7 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QDTE+21.1%36.1% as cash0.7 pts behind QQQ
RECI0.8 pts ahead of SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+1.6%RECI+2.4%0.8 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+1.6%RECI+2.4%0.8 pts ahead of SPY

Performance, window by window

QDTE and RECI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QDTERECIQDTERECIQDTERECI
3 months−0.9%not published7.6%not published+1.6 ptsnot published
6 months+19.7%not published16.2%not published−4.5 ptsnot published
1 year+21.1%not published36.1%not published−0.7 ptsnot published
Since launch+59.9%+2.4%74.1%0.7%−4.3 pts+0.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QDTE and RECI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QDTE
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
RECI
Columbia Research Enhanced Core Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SPY
IssuerRoundhillColumbia
Strategy0DTE covered callcovered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysweeklynot established
Payout rate, annualized20.8%8.0%
Expense ratio0.96%0.30%
Cash paid, 1 year36.1%0.7% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026)
Price change, 1 year−19.2%+1.7%
Total return, 1 year+21.1%+2.4% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+1.6%
Ahead or behind−0.7 pts+0.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age925 days66 days
Net assets$967mnot published

QDTE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTE paid 36.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 19.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.8%, paid weekly.

RECI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Jul 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, RECI paid 0.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.4%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +1.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.0%, paid periodically.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, QDTE or RECI?
QDTE charges 0.96% a year and RECI charges 0.30%, so RECI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QDTE against RECI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QDTE against RECI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qdte-vs-reci Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources