MAGY vs VAIE: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MAGY and VAIE both write options for income. Net assets: $96m on Oct 20, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF, and $67m on Oct 19, 2026 for VegaShares US Equity Autocallable Income ETF.
VAIE costs 0.25 points a year less; MAGY is 1.4 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| MAGY | VAIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.99% | 0.74% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026 | $96m | $67m |
| Total return, 1 year | +1.9% | not published |
| Benchmark | Magnificent Seven, measured through MAGS | not published |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Price change | fell 23.8% (1 year) | fell 3.6% (since May 12, 2026) |
10.3 pts behind MAGS
MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.8%, price −23.8%, total +1.9%, MAGS +12.2%, −10.3 pts. Figures to Oct 20, 2026.
MAGS
+12.2%
MAGY
+1.9%
24.8% cash
10.3 pts behind MAGS
Total return, distributions reinvested
10.3 pts behind MAGS
MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.8%, price −23.8%, total +1.9%, MAGS +12.2%, −10.3 pts. Figures to Oct 20, 2026.
MAGS
+12.2%
MAGY
+1.9%
10.3 pts behind MAGS
24.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.8%, price −23.8%, total +1.9%, MAGS +12.2%, −10.3 pts. Figures to Oct 20, 2026.
Figures to Oct 20, 2026.
Not measured
VAIE since launch: paid 6.8%, price −3.6%, total +3.3%, not measured against a benchmark. Figures to Oct 20, 2026.
VAIE
+3.3%
6.8% as cash
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
VAIE since launch: paid 6.8%, price −3.6%, total +3.3%, not measured against a benchmark. Figures to Oct 20, 2026.
VAIE
+3.3%
6.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. VAIE since launch: paid 6.8%, price −3.6%, total +3.3%, not measured against a benchmark. Figures to Oct 20, 2026.
Figures to Oct 20, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | MAGY | VAIE | MAGY | VAIE | MAGY | VAIE |
| 3 months | +6.0% | +2.5% | 5.6% | 4.1% | −1.9 pts | not measured |
| 6 months | +7.4% | – | 12.1% | – | −3.1 pts | – |
| 1 year | +1.9% | – | 24.8% | – | −10.3 pts | – |
| Since launch Not the same days: MAGY Apr 2025 · VAIE May 2026 | +27.7% | +3.3% | 43.3% | 6.8% | −39.5 pts | not measured |
Source: ETFIQ. – means no data for this window, usually because the fund is younger than it. Open this comparison in the app →
On the same fields
As of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid is what the fund distributed over the window, as a share of its price at the start. Payout rate is its latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
About MAGY
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026, MAGY paid 24.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 23.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.9%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +12.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.3 pts. At its price on Oct 20, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.2%, paid weekly.
About VAIE
Over the period from its first trade on May 12, 2026 to Oct 20, 2026, VAIE paid 6.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.3%. At its price on Oct 20, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 16.8%, paid weekly.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MAGY against VAIE, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-vaie
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). MAGY against VAIE. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-vaie
[MAGY against VAIE (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-vaie)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.