Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
MAGY vs QVOL: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MAGY and QVOL both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MAGY and QVOL
Net assets: $94m on Nov 4, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF, and $49m on Aug 31, 2026 for Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF.
7.8 pts behind MAGS
MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MAGS
+6.3%
MAGY
−1.5%
7.8 pts behind MAGS
Total return, distributions reinvested
7.8 pts behind MAGS
MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MAGS
+6.3%
MAGY
−1.5%
7.8 pts behind MAGS
24.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.7 pts behind ONEQ
QVOL since launch: paid 6.4%, price −13.6%, total −7.8%, ONEQ −0.8%, −7.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
ONEQ
−0.8%
QVOL
−7.8%
7 pts behind ONEQ
Total return, distributions reinvested
7 pts behind ONEQ
QVOL since launch: paid 6.4%, price −13.6%, total −7.8%, ONEQ −0.8%, −7.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
ONEQ
−0.8%
QVOL
−7.8%
7 pts behind ONEQ
6.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QVOL since launch: paid 6.4%, price −13.6%, total −7.8%, ONEQ −0.8%, −7.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
QVOL costs 0.17 points a year less.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | MAGY | QVOL |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.5% | not published |
| Price change | fell 26.1% (1 year) | fell 13.6% (since May 12, 2026) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Magnificent Seven, measured through MAGS | Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF, measured through ONEQ |
| Against its benchmark, same days | behind by 7.8 pts | behind by 7.0 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.99% | 0.82% |
| Net assets, MAGY as of Nov 4, 2026 and QVOL as of Aug 31, 2026 | $94m | $49m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, MAGY and QVOL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | MAGY | QVOL | MAGY | QVOL | MAGY | QVOL |
| 3 months | +4.0% | −12.2% | 5.4% | 3.2% | +1.2 pts | −10.0 pts |
| 6 months | +0.8% | – | 11.3% | – | −1.8 pts | – |
| 1 year | −1.5% | – | 24.0% | – | −7.8 pts | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: MAGY Apr 2025 · QVOL May 2026 | +25.7% | −7.8% | 44.0% | 6.4% | −37.0 pts | −7.0 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
MAGY
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 26.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.5%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +6.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.1%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
QVOL
Over the period from its first trade on May 12, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, QVOL paid 6.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 13.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −7.8%. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) returned −0.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.0 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MAGY against QVOL, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-qvol
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). MAGY against QVOL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-qvol
[MAGY against QVOL (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-qvol)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.