Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

MAGY vs YLDE: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year MAGY paid 26.5% of its price in cash against YLDE’s 7.6%, though YLDE returned more with it reinvested.

Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF and Franklin ClearBridge Enhanced Income ETF.

26.5%MAGY cash paid, 1 year
7.6%YLDE cash paid, 1 year
+1.8%MAGY total return, 1 year
+10.5%YLDE total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: YLDE scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

MAGY 22.6YLDE 56.23.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

MAGY9.4 pts behind MAGS · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
MAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGSTotal return, distributions reinvestedMAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGS
YLDE6 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%YLDE+10.5%7.6% of it arrived as cash6 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%YLDE+10.5%6 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MAGY and YLDE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in MAGYOnly in YLDE
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.02%WILLIAMS COMPANIES INC (THE) 4.63%
First American Government Obligations Fu 0.36%EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 4.05%
MAGS 09/25/2026 71.37 C -0.38%ALPHABET INC 3.60%
NVIDIA CORP 3.03%
NESTLE' SA/AG 2.94%
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC 2.83%
APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT INC 2.78%
MICROSOFT CORP 2.67%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

MAGY and YLDE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
MAGYYLDEMAGYYLDEMAGYYLDE
3 months+3.7%+2.5%6.1%2.3%−3.9 pts+0.3 pts
6 months+8.1%+8.4%12.9%4.1%−12.7 pts−9.6 pts
1 year+1.8%+10.5%26.5%7.6%−9.4 pts−6.0 pts
3 yearsnot published+51.1%not published16.8%not published−27.3 pts
Since launch+25.6%+181.4%42.0%42.1%−37.5 pts−86.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
MAGY and YLDE on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MAGY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF
Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly
YLDE
Franklin ClearBridge Enhanced Income ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerRoundhillFranklin
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkMagnificent Seven (MAGS)S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized19.2%7.0%
Expense ratio0.99%0.48%
Cash paid, 1 year26.5%7.6%
Price change, 1 year−25.3%+2.6%
Total return, 1 year+1.8%+10.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+11.2%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−9.4 pts−6.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age513 days3405 days
Net assets$102m$170m

MAGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.2%, paid weekly.

YLDE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YLDE paid 7.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.5%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.0%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, MAGY or YLDE?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting price in cash and YLDE paid 7.6%, so MAGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, MAGY or YLDE?
With every distribution reinvested, MAGY returned +1.8% and YLDE returned +10.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so YLDE returned more.
Which is cheaper, MAGY or YLDE?
MAGY charges 0.99% a year and YLDE charges 0.48%, so YLDE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MAGY against YLDE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGY against YLDE, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-ylde Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources