Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

FEPI vs MAGY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year MAGY paid 26.5% of its price in cash against FEPI’s 23.4%, though FEPI returned more with it reinvested.

REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF.

23.4%FEPI cash paid, 1 year
26.5%MAGY cash paid, 1 year
+15.7%FEPI total return, 1 year
+1.8%MAGY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: FEPI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

FEPI 33.5MAGY 22.63.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

FEPI6.1 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%FEPI+15.7%23.4% of it arrived as cash6.1 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%FEPI+15.7%23.4% as cash6.1 pts behind QQQ
MAGY9.4 pts behind MAGS · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
MAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGSTotal return, distributions reinvestedMAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGS

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FEPI and MAGY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in FEPIOnly in MAGY
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 9.98%Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.02%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 8.91%First American Government Obligations Fu 0.36%
ALPHABET INC. 8.83%MAGS 09/25/2026 71.37 C -0.38%
BROADCOM INC. 8.05%
NVIDIA CORPORATION 7.76%
TESLA, INC. 7.47%
INTEL CORPORATION 5.24%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 5.21%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

FEPI and MAGY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
FEPIMAGYFEPIMAGYFEPIMAGY
3 months+2.9%+3.7%6.0%6.1%+5.4 pts−3.9 pts
6 months+17.2%+8.1%12.8%12.9%−7.1 pts−12.7 pts
1 year+15.7%+1.8%23.4%26.5%−6.1 pts−9.4 pts
Since launch+69.0%+25.6%66.8%42.0%−28.5 pts−37.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
FEPI and MAGY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FEPI
REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF
Covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
MAGY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF
Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly
IssuerREXRoundhill
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxyMagnificent Seven (MAGS)
Paysweeklyweekly
Payout rate, annualized24.9%19.2%
Expense ratio0.65%0.99%
Cash paid, 1 year23.4%26.5%
Price change, 1 year−10.0%−25.3%
Total return, 1 year+15.7%+1.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+11.2%
Ahead or behind−6.1 pts−9.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age1073 days513 days
Net assets$710m$102m

FEPI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FEPI paid 23.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 10.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 24.9%, paid weekly.

MAGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.2%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, FEPI or MAGY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FEPI paid 23.4% of its starting price in cash and MAGY paid 26.5%, so MAGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, FEPI or MAGY?
With every distribution reinvested, FEPI returned +15.7% and MAGY returned +1.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so FEPI returned more.
Which is cheaper, FEPI or MAGY?
FEPI charges 0.65% a year and MAGY charges 0.99%, so FEPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FEPI against MAGY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FEPI against MAGY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fepi-vs-magy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources