Which paid more, MAGY or SCLZ?

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its starting price in cash and SCLZ paid 8.5%, so MAGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, MAGY or SCLZ?

With every distribution reinvested, MAGY returned −1.5% and SCLZ +10.6% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.

Which is cheaper, MAGY or SCLZ?

MAGY charges 0.99% a year and SCLZ charges 0.79%, so SCLZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Income ETFs

MAGY vs SCLZ: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its price in cash against SCLZ’s 8.5%, though SCLZ returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MAGY and SCLZ

Net assets: $94m on Nov 4, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF, and $20m on Jun 30, 2026 for Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF.

MAGY on its own →SCLZ on its own →

At a glance

24.0%

MAGY cash paid, 1 year

8.5%

SCLZ cash paid, 1 year

−1.5%

MAGY total return, 1 year

+10.6%

SCLZ total return, 1 year

MAGY · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 7.8 pts behind MAGS

MAGY

−1.5%

MAGS

+6.3%

7.8 pts behind MAGS

MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

MAGS

+6.3%

MAGY

−1.5%

7.8 pts behind MAGS

Total return, distributions reinvested

7.8 pts behind MAGS

MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

MAGS

+6.3%

MAGY

−1.5%

7.8 pts behind MAGS

24.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SCLZ · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 4.2 pts behind SPY

SCLZ

+10.6%

SPY

+14.8%

4.2 pts behind SPY

SCLZ over 1 year: paid 8.5%, price +1.6%, total +10.6%, SPY +14.8%, −4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

SCLZ

+10.6%

8.5% of it arrived as cash

4.2 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

4.2 pts behind SPY

SCLZ over 1 year: paid 8.5%, price +1.6%, total +10.6%, SPY +14.8%, −4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

SCLZ

+10.6%

8.5% cash

4.2 pts behind SPY

8.5% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. SCLZ over 1 year: paid 8.5%, price +1.6%, total +10.6%, SPY +14.8%, −4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

SCLZ costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.1 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

MAGY vs SCLZ: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	MAGY	SCLZ
Paid and earned
Measure	MAGY	SCLZ
Total return, 1 year	−1.5%	+10.6%
Price change, 1 year	fell 26.1%	rose 1.6%
Return of capital, issuer estimate	100% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Measure	MAGY	SCLZ
Benchmark	Magnificent Seven, measured through MAGS	S&P 500, measured through SPY
Cost and size
Measure	MAGY	SCLZ
Expense ratio	0.99%	0.79%
Net assets, MAGY as of Nov 4, 2026 and SCLZ as of Jun 30, 2026	$94m	$20m
Holdings
Measure	MAGY	SCLZ
Holdings in common	0%

ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · SCLZ scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?

IQ Income Score17.1MAGY71.6SCLZ

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

MAGY 17.1

SCLZ 71.6

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, MAGY and SCLZ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MAGY SCLZ

Only in one fund ↓

Only in MAGY

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.12%

MAGS 11/06/2026 71.22 C -0.47%

Only in SCLZ

MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 7.95%

APPLE INC 6.20%

NVIDIA CORP 6.03%

ALPHABET INC 5.22%

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 5.18%

BROADCOM INC 4.74%

ELI LILLY & COMPANY 3.88%

AMAZON.COM INC 3.77%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF · Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly SCLZ Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF · Dividend stocks with call overlay on SPY, paying monthly

Issuer Roundhill Swan

Strategy covered call dividend stocks with call overlay

Benchmark Magnificent Seven (MAGS) S&P 500 (SPY)

Pays weekly monthly

Payout rate, annualized 25.1% 8.7%

Expense ratio 0.99% 0.79%

Cash paid, 1 year 24.0% 8.5%

Price change, 1 year −26.1% +1.6%

Total return, 1 year −1.5% +10.6%

Benchmark return, 1 year +6.3% +14.8%

Ahead or behind −7.8 pts −4.2 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate 100% not published

Age 1.5 years 2.7 years

Net assets, MAGY as of Nov 4, 2026 and SCLZ as of Jun 30, 2026 $94m $20m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: MAGY vs SCLZ: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	MAGY	SCLZ	MAGY	SCLZ	MAGY	SCLZ
3 months	+4.0%	0.0%	5.4%	2.1%	+1.2 pts	+0.2 pts
6 months	+0.8%	+4.4%	11.3%	4.3%	−1.8 pts	−0.6 pts
1 year	−1.5%	+10.6%	24.0%	8.5%	−7.8 pts	−4.2 pts
Since launchNot the same days: MAGY Apr 2025 · SCLZ Feb 2024	+25.7%	+35.4%	44.0%	21.2%	−37.0 pts	−20.8 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

MAGY

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 26.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.5%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +6.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.1%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

SCLZ

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, SCLZ paid 8.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.7%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, MAGY or SCLZ?: Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its starting price in cash and SCLZ paid 8.5%, so MAGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, MAGY or SCLZ?: With every distribution reinvested, MAGY returned −1.5% and SCLZ +10.6% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, MAGY or SCLZ?: MAGY charges 0.99% a year and SCLZ charges 0.79%, so SCLZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

MAGY vs QUSA MAGY vs DRKY MAGY vs SPUT MAGY vs OCTH SCLZ vs VAIE SCLZ vs QVOL SCLZ vs YSPC SCLZ vs OARK

Where to next

Magnificent Seven (MAGS) →S&P 500 (SPY) →MAGY on its own →SCLZ on its own →MAGY dividend history →MAGY holdings →SCLZ dividend history →SCLZ holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

MAGY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

MAGY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

MAGY 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Roundhill page for MAGY ↗

SCLZ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

SCLZ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Swan website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MAGY against SCLZ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-sclz

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.