Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

MAGY vs XPAY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year MAGY paid 26.5% of its price in cash against XPAY’s 19.9%, though XPAY returned more with it reinvested.

Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF and Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF.

26.5%MAGY cash paid, 1 year
19.9%XPAY cash paid, 1 year
+1.8%MAGY total return, 1 year
+15.7%XPAY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XPAY scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

MAGY 22.6XPAY 50.33.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

MAGY9.4 pts behind MAGS · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
MAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGSTotal return, distributions reinvestedMAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGS
XPAY0.9 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%XPAY+15.7%19.9% of it arrived as cash0.9 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%XPAY+15.7%19.9% as cash0.9 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MAGY and XPAY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions MAGY and XPAY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingMAGYXPAY
First American Government Obligations Fu0.36%4.95%
Only in each
Only in MAGYOnly in XPAY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.02%SPY 02/12/2027 33.47 C 13.75%
MAGS 09/25/2026 71.37 C -0.38%SPY 07/16/2027 36.7 C 11.79%
SPY 03/12/2027 33.67 C 11.51%
SPY 04/16/2027 33.87 C 11.49%
SPY 06/11/2027 37.11 C 10.07%
SPY 01/15/2027 33.21 C 6.96%
SPY 12/11/2026 33.1 C 6.40%
SPY 09/10/2027 37.99 C 5.57%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

MAGY and XPAY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
MAGYXPAYMAGYXPAYMAGYXPAY
3 months+3.7%+2.0%6.1%5.0%−3.9 pts−0.3 pts
6 months+8.1%+17.8%12.9%11.1%−12.7 pts−0.2 pts
1 year+1.8%+15.7%26.5%19.9%−9.4 pts−0.9 pts
Since launch+25.6%+34.7%42.0%37.5%−37.5 pts−2.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
MAGY and XPAY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MAGY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF
Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly
XPAY
Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerRoundhillRoundhill
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkMagnificent Seven (MAGS)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized19.2%20.8%
Expense ratio0.99%0.49%
Cash paid, 1 year26.5%19.9%
Price change, 1 year−25.3%−5.8%
Total return, 1 year+1.8%+15.7%
Benchmark return, 1 year+11.2%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−9.4 pts−0.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age513 days687 days
Net assets$102m$179m

MAGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.2%, paid weekly.

XPAY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XPAY paid 19.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.8%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, MAGY or XPAY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting price in cash and XPAY paid 19.9%, so MAGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, MAGY or XPAY?
With every distribution reinvested, MAGY returned +1.8% and XPAY returned +15.7% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so XPAY returned more.
Which is cheaper, MAGY or XPAY?
MAGY charges 0.99% a year and XPAY charges 0.49%, so XPAY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MAGY against XPAY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGY against XPAY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-xpay Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources