Data as of .
MAGY vs XISE: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year MAGY paid 26.5% of its price in cash against XISE’s 6.5%, though XISE returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XISE scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MAGY and XISE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in MAGY | Only in XISE |
|---|---|
| Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.02% | 2027-09-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® 98.96% |
| First American Government Obligations Fu 0.36% | 2027-09-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® 5.02% |
| MAGS 09/25/2026 71.37 C -0.38% | US Dollar 1.19% |
| U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 01/28/2027 0.55% | |
| U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 02/25/2027 0.55% | |
| U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/29/2026 0.55% | |
| U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 12/01/2026 0.55% | |
| U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 12/31/2026 0.55% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAGY | XISE | MAGY | XISE | MAGY | XISE | |
| 3 months | +3.7% | +1.2% | 6.1% | 2.0% | −3.9 pts | −1.1 pts |
| 6 months | +8.1% | +4.9% | 12.9% | 3.6% | −12.7 pts | −13.2 pts |
| 1 year | +1.8% | +6.1% | 26.5% | 6.5% | −9.4 pts | −10.5 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +20.9% | not published | 19.1% | not published | −57.5 pts |
| Since launch | +25.6% | +21.1% | 42.0% | 19.2% | −37.5 pts | −57.0 pts |
| MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly | XISE FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - September Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Roundhill | First Trust |
| Strategy | covered call | buffer with income |
| Benchmark | Magnificent Seven (MAGS) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 19.2% | 6.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.99% | 0.85% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 26.5% | 6.5% |
| Price change, 1 year | −25.3% | −0.6% |
| Total return, 1 year | +1.8% | +6.1% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +11.2% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −9.4 pts | −10.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 513 days | 1096 days |
| Net assets | $102m | $32m |
MAGY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.2%, paid weekly.
XISE in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XISE paid 6.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.0%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, MAGY or XISE?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting price in cash and XISE paid 6.5%, so MAGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, MAGY or XISE?
- With every distribution reinvested, MAGY returned +1.8% and XISE returned +6.1% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so XISE returned more.
- Which is cheaper, MAGY or XISE?
- MAGY charges 0.99% a year and XISE charges 0.85%, so XISE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGY against XISE, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-xise Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.