ACYN vs TLA: which paid, and which earned it?

ACYN and TLA both write options for income. FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Income ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF.

4.5%
ACYN cash paid, since launch
11.1%
TLA cash paid, since launch
+8.2%
ACYN total return, since launch
+10.4%
TLA total return, since launch
ACYN · since launch to Sep 30, 20262.7 pts behind SPY
ACYN
+8.2%
SPY
+10.9%

2.7 pts behind SPY

ACYN since launch: paid 4.5%, price +3.5%, total +8.2%, SPY +10.9%, −2.7 pts.

SPY

+10.9%

ACYN

+8.2%

4.5% as cash

2.7 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.7 pts behind SPY

ACYN since launch: paid 4.5%, price +3.5%, total +8.2%, SPY +10.9%, −2.7 pts.

SPY

+10.9%

ACYN

+8.2%

2.7 pts behind SPY

4.5% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACYN since launch: paid 4.5%, price +3.5%, total +8.2%, SPY +10.9%, −2.7 pts.

TLA · since launch to Sep 30, 202626.3 pts ahead of TSLA
TLA
+10.4%
TSLA
−15.9%

26.3 pts ahead of TSLA

TLA since launch: paid 11.1%, price −1.4%, total +10.4%, TSLA −15.9%, +26.3 pts.

TSLA

−15.9%

TLA

+10.4%

11.1% of it arrived as cash

26.3 pts ahead of TSLA

Total return, distributions reinvested

26.3 pts ahead of TSLA

TLA since launch: paid 11.1%, price −1.4%, total +10.4%, TSLA −15.9%, +26.3 pts.

TSLA

−15.9%

TLA

+10.4%

26.3 pts ahead of TSLA

11.1% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +10.9%. TLA since launch: paid 11.1%, price −1.4%, total +10.4%, TSLA −15.9%, +26.3 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACYNTLAACYNTLAACYNTLA
3 months+3.2%+3.3%1.8%3.1%+0.7 pts+19.9 pts
6 months+7.0%+11.2%4.4%8.2%−10.0 pts+18.1 pts
Since launch
ACYN Feb 2026 · TLA Feb 2026
+8.2%+10.4%4.5%11.1%−2.7 pts+26.3 pts

ACYN and TLA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACYN
FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Income ETF · Autocallable on SPY, paying monthly
TLA
GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF · Autocallable on TSLA, paying monthly
Issuer First Trust GraniteShares
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy Tesla (TSLA)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 9.9% 18.4%
Expense ratio 0.75% 1.07%
Cash paid, 1 year 4.5% (since launch on Feb 25, 2026) 11.1% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026)
Price change, 1 year +3.5% −1.4%
Total return, 1 year +8.2% (since launch on Feb 25, 2026) +10.4% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year +10.9% −15.9%
Ahead or behind −2.7 pts +26.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 4%
Age 217 days 239 days
Net assets $2.2bn $5m

ACYN and TLA on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACYN in plain words

Over the period since launch on Feb 25, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACYN paid 4.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.2%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +10.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.7 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.9%, paid monthly.

TLA in plain words

Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, TLA paid 11.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 1.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.4%. Tesla (TSLA) returned −15.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 26.3 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 18.4%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 4% of the distribution paid Jun 5, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACYN or TLA?
ACYN charges 0.75% a year and TLA charges 1.07%, so ACYN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACYN against TLA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acyn-vs-tla

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.