TLA vs TSLW: which paid, and which earned it?
TLA and TSLW both write options for income. GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF and Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay ETF.
26.3 pts ahead of TSLA
TLA since launch: paid 11.1%, price −1.4%, total +10.4%, TSLA −15.9%, +26.3 pts.
TSLA
−15.9%
TLA
+10.4%
11.1% as cash
26.3 pts ahead of TSLA
Total return, distributions reinvested
26.3 pts ahead of TSLA
TLA since launch: paid 11.1%, price −1.4%, total +10.4%, TSLA −15.9%, +26.3 pts.
TSLA
−15.9%
TLA
+10.4%
26.3 pts ahead of TSLA
11.1% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. TLA since launch: paid 11.1%, price −1.4%, total +10.4%, TSLA −15.9%, +26.3 pts.
8.8 pts behind TSLA
TSLW over 1 year: paid 36.9%, price −58.2%, total −29.0%, TSLA −20.2%, −8.8 pts.
TSLA
−20.2%
TSLW
−29.0%
8.8 pts behind TSLA
Total return, distributions reinvested
8.8 pts behind TSLA
TSLW over 1 year: paid 36.9%, price −58.2%, total −29.0%, TSLA −20.2%, −8.8 pts.
TSLA
−20.2%
TSLW
−29.0%
8.8 pts behind TSLA
36.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +10.4%. TSLW over 1 year: paid 36.9%, price −58.2%, total −29.0%, TSLA −20.2%, −8.8 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | TLA | TSLW | TLA | TSLW | TLA | TSLW |
| 3 months | +3.3% | −20.9% | 3.1% | 8.7% | +19.9 pts | −4.3 pts |
| 6 months | +11.2% | −11.6% | 8.2% | 20.1% | +18.1 pts | −4.7 pts |
| 1 year | not published | −29.0% | not published | 36.9% | not published | −8.8 pts |
| Since launch TLA Feb 2026 · TSLW Jun 2025 | +10.4% | −4.8% | 11.1% | 61.0% | +26.3 pts | −8.4 pts |
TLA and TSLW over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
TLA and TSLW on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
TLA in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, TLA paid 11.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 1.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.4%. Tesla (TSLA) returned −15.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 26.3 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 18.4%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 4% of the distribution paid Jun 5, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
TSLW in plain words
Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, TSLW paid 36.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 58.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −29.0%. Tesla (TSLA) returned −20.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 8.8 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 45.0%, paid weekly.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, TLA against TSLW, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/tla-vs-tslw
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, TLA against TSLW, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/tla-vs-tslw Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, TLA against TSLW, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/tla-vs-tslw
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). TLA against TSLW. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/tla-vs-tslw
- Markdown
- [TLA against TSLW (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/tla-vs-tslw)