TSLW vs XVTS: which paid, and which earned it?
TSLW and XVTS both write options for income. Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay ETF and FT Vest TSLA & Target Income ETF.
8.8 pts behind TSLA
TSLW over 1 year: paid 36.9%, price −58.2%, total −29.0%, TSLA −20.2%, −8.8 pts.
TSLA
−20.2%
TSLW
−29.0%
8.8 pts behind TSLA
Total return, distributions reinvested
8.8 pts behind TSLA
TSLW over 1 year: paid 36.9%, price −58.2%, total −29.0%, TSLA −20.2%, −8.8 pts.
TSLA
−20.2%
TSLW
−29.0%
8.8 pts behind TSLA
36.9% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. TSLW over 1 year: paid 36.9%, price −58.2%, total −29.0%, TSLA −20.2%, −8.8 pts.
2.1 pts ahead of TSLA
XVTS since launch: paid 3.3%, price 0.0%, total +3.1%, TSLA +1.1%, +2.1 pts.
TSLA
+1.1%
XVTS
+3.1%
2.1 pts ahead of TSLA
Total return, distributions reinvested
2.1 pts ahead of TSLA
XVTS since launch: paid 3.3%, price 0.0%, total +3.1%, TSLA +1.1%, +2.1 pts.
TSLA
+1.1%
XVTS
+3.1%
2.1 pts ahead of TSLA
3.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +3.1%. XVTS since launch: paid 3.3%, price 0.0%, total +3.1%, TSLA +1.1%, +2.1 pts.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, TSLW and XVTS hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
23% in common
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | TSLW | XVTS | TSLW | XVTS | TSLW | XVTS |
| 3 months | −20.9% | not published | 8.7% | not published | −4.3 pts | not published |
| 6 months | −11.6% | not published | 20.1% | not published | −4.7 pts | not published |
| 1 year | −29.0% | not published | 36.9% | not published | −8.8 pts | not published |
| Since launch TSLW Jun 2025 · XVTS Aug 2026 | −4.8% | +3.1% | 61.0% | 3.3% | −8.4 pts | +2.1 pts |
TSLW and XVTS over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
TSLW and XVTS on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
TSLW in plain words
Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, TSLW paid 36.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 58.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −29.0%. Tesla (TSLA) returned −20.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 8.8 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 45.0%, paid weekly.
XVTS in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 19, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, XVTS paid 3.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.1%. Tesla (TSLA) returned +1.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.1 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 39.8%, paid periodically.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, TSLW against XVTS, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/tslw-vs-xvts
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, TSLW against XVTS, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/tslw-vs-xvts Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, TSLW against XVTS, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/tslw-vs-xvts
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). TSLW against XVTS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/tslw-vs-xvts
- Markdown
- [TSLW against XVTS (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/tslw-vs-xvts)