ACYN vs PLA: which paid, and which earned it?

ACYN and PLA both write options for income. FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Income ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable PLTR ETF.

4.5%
ACYN cash paid, since launch
6.9%
PLA cash paid, since launch
+8.2%
ACYN total return, since launch
+11.1%
PLA total return, since launch
ACYN · since launch to Sep 30, 20262.7 pts behind SPY
ACYN
+8.2%
SPY
+10.9%

2.7 pts behind SPY

ACYN since launch: paid 4.5%, price +3.5%, total +8.2%, SPY +10.9%, −2.7 pts.

SPY

+10.9%

ACYN

+8.2%

2.7 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.7 pts behind SPY

ACYN since launch: paid 4.5%, price +3.5%, total +8.2%, SPY +10.9%, −2.7 pts.

SPY

+10.9%

ACYN

+8.2%

2.7 pts behind SPY

4.5% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACYN since launch: paid 4.5%, price +3.5%, total +8.2%, SPY +10.9%, −2.7 pts.

PLA · since launch to Sep 30, 202627.2 pts behind PLTR
PLA
+11.1%
PLTR
+38.3%

27.2 pts behind PLTR

PLA since launch: paid 6.9%, price +3.7%, total +11.1%, PLTR +38.3%, −27.2 pts.

PLTR

+38.3%

PLA

+11.1%

6.9% as cash

27.2 pts behind PLTR

Total return, distributions reinvested

27.2 pts behind PLTR

PLA since launch: paid 6.9%, price +3.7%, total +11.1%, PLTR +38.3%, −27.2 pts.

PLTR

+38.3%

PLA

+11.1%

27.2 pts behind PLTR

6.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +38.3%. PLA since launch: paid 6.9%, price +3.7%, total +11.1%, PLTR +38.3%, −27.2 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACYNPLAACYNPLAACYNPLA
3 months+3.2%+11.5%1.8%3.5%+0.7 pts−37.2 pts
6 months+7.0%not published4.4%not published−10.0 ptsnot published
Since launch
ACYN Feb 2026 · PLA May 2026
+8.2%+11.1%4.5%6.9%−2.7 pts−27.2 pts

ACYN and PLA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACYN
FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Income ETF · Autocallable on SPY, paying monthly
PLA
GraniteShares Autocallable PLTR ETF · Autocallable on PLTR, paying monthly
Issuer First Trust GraniteShares
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy Palantir (PLTR)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 9.9% 19.3%
Expense ratio 0.75% 1.07%
Cash paid, 1 year 4.5% (since launch on Feb 25, 2026) 6.9% (since launch on May 19, 2026)
Price change, 1 year +3.5% +3.7%
Total return, 1 year +8.2% (since launch on Feb 25, 2026) +11.1% (since launch on May 19, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year +10.9% +38.3%
Ahead or behind −2.7 pts −27.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 0%
Age 217 days 134 days
Net assets $2.2bn $4m

ACYN and PLA on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACYN in plain words

Over the period since launch on Feb 25, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACYN paid 4.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.2%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +10.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.7 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.9%, paid monthly.

PLA in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 19, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, PLA paid 6.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.1%. Palantir (PLTR) returned +38.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 27.2 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.3%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACYN or PLA?
ACYN charges 0.75% a year and PLA charges 1.07%, so ACYN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACYN against PLA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acyn-vs-pla

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.