Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsOpen in the appaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

MPIM vs PLA: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+10.5 pts
3 months to Nov 12, 2026: PLA ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.48 pts
A year: MPIM 0.70%, PLA 1.18%, per filings dated Aug 7, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026
Overlap
–
No book read for both funds
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

MPIM costs 0.48 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

MPIM vs PLA: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureMPIMPLA
Paid and earned
Price changefell 12.8% (since Aug 12, 2026)fell 0.1% (since May 19, 2026)
Against its benchmark
Benchmarknot publishedPalantir (PLTR)
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.70%1.18%
Net assetsnot read by ETFIQ$6.9m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Key numbers
3.0%
MPIM cash paid, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
8.6%
PLA cash paid, since launch, May 19, 2026
−10.0%
MPIM total return, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
+8.7%
PLA total return, since launch, May 19, 2026
MPIM · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured
MPIM
−10.0%
none

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

3.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.
PLA · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 18.2 pts behind PLTR
PLA
+8.7%
PLTR
+26.9%

18.2 pts behind PLTR

PLA since launch: paid 8.6%, price −0.1%, total +8.7%, PLTR +26.9%, −18.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

PLTR

+26.9%

PLA

+8.7%

8.6% as cash

18.2 pts behind PLTR

Total return, distributions reinvested

18.2 pts behind PLTR

PLA since launch: paid 8.6%, price −0.1%, total +8.7%, PLTR +26.9%, −18.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

PLTR

+26.9%

PLA

+8.7%

18.2 pts behind PLTR

8.6% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. PLA since launch: paid 8.6%, price −0.1%, total +8.7%, PLTR +26.9%, −18.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

MPIM m+ Income Momentum Autocall ETF · Autocallable PLA GraniteShares Autocallable PLTR ETF · Autocallable on PLTR, paying monthly
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark not set Palantir (PLTR)
Pays not established monthly
Payout rate, annualized 17.0% 20.1%
Expense ratio 0.70% 1.18%
Cash paid, 1 year 3.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) 8.6% (since launch, May 19, 2026)
Price change, 1 year −12.8% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) −0.1% (since launch, May 19, 2026)
Total return, 1 year −10.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) +8.7% (since launch, May 19, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year not published +26.9% (since launch, May 19, 2026)
Ahead or behind not available −18.2 pts (since launch, May 19, 2026)
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 0%
Age 92 days 177 days
Net assets not read by ETFIQ $6.9m

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: MPIM vs PLA: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowMPIMPLAMPIMPLAMPIMPLA
3 months−10.6%−0.1%3.0%3.2%not measured+4.1 pts
Since launchNot the same days: MPIM Aug 2026 · PLA May 2026−10.0%+8.7%3.0%8.6%not measured−18.2 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

PLA flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MPIM

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 12, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, MPIM paid 3.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −10.0%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.0%, paid periodically.

PLA

Over the period from its first trade on May 19, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, PLA paid 8.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.7%. Palantir (PLTR) returned +26.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 18.2 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.1%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, MPIM or PLA?
MPIM charges 0.70% a year and PLA charges 1.18%, so MPIM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MPIM against PLA, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/mpim-vs-pla

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

MPIM and PLA both write options for income.

Growth of 100

MPIM and PLA

Total return, distributions reinvested, 3 months.

MPIM −10.6%PLA −0.1%
Aug 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

MPIM −10.6%, PLA −0.1%: PLA +10.5 pts ahead, 3 months, Aug 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.