ACQQ vs PLA: which paid, and which earned it?
ACQQ and PLA both write options for income. ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable PLTR ETF.
About even with QQQ
ACQQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price +1.6%, total +1.6%, QQQ +1.3%, +0.3 pts.
QQQ
+1.3%
ACQQ
+1.6%
about even with QQQ
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with QQQ
ACQQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price +1.6%, total +1.6%, QQQ +1.3%, +0.3 pts.
QQQ
+1.3%
ACQQ
+1.6%
about even with QQQ
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACQQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price +1.6%, total +1.6%, QQQ +1.3%, +0.3 pts.
27.2 pts behind PLTR
PLA since launch: paid 6.9%, price +3.7%, total +11.1%, PLTR +38.3%, −27.2 pts.
PLTR
+38.3%
PLA
+11.1%
6.9% as cash
27.2 pts behind PLTR
Total return, distributions reinvested
27.2 pts behind PLTR
PLA since launch: paid 6.9%, price +3.7%, total +11.1%, PLTR +38.3%, −27.2 pts.
PLTR
+38.3%
PLA
+11.1%
27.2 pts behind PLTR
6.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +38.3%. PLA since launch: paid 6.9%, price +3.7%, total +11.1%, PLTR +38.3%, −27.2 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACQQ | PLA | ACQQ | PLA | ACQQ | PLA |
| 3 months | not published | +11.5% | not published | 3.5% | not published | −37.2 pts |
| Since launch ACQQ Aug 2026 · PLA May 2026 | +1.6% | +11.1% | 0.0% | 6.9% | +0.3 pts | −27.2 pts |
ACQQ and PLA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACQQ and PLA on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACQQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACQQ paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.6%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +1.3% over the same days, so a holder was about even.
PLA in plain words
Over the period since launch on May 19, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, PLA paid 6.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.1%. Palantir (PLTR) returned +38.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 27.2 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.3%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACQQ against PLA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-pla
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACQQ against PLA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-pla Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACQQ against PLA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-pla
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACQQ against PLA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-pla
- Markdown
- [ACQQ against PLA (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-pla)