ACRT vs TLA: which paid, and which earned it?
ACRT and TLA both write options for income. ProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF.
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
IWM
−8.7%
ACRT
−8.7%
about even with IWM
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
IWM
−8.7%
ACRT
−8.7%
about even with IWM
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
26.3 pts ahead of TSLA
TLA since launch: paid 11.1%, price −1.4%, total +10.4%, TSLA −15.9%, +26.3 pts.
TSLA
−15.9%
TLA
+10.4%
11.1% of it arrived as cash
26.3 pts ahead of TSLA
Total return, distributions reinvested
26.3 pts ahead of TSLA
TLA since launch: paid 11.1%, price −1.4%, total +10.4%, TSLA −15.9%, +26.3 pts.
TSLA
−15.9%
TLA
+10.4%
26.3 pts ahead of TSLA
11.1% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +10.4%. TLA since launch: paid 11.1%, price −1.4%, total +10.4%, TSLA −15.9%, +26.3 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACRT | TLA | ACRT | TLA | ACRT | TLA |
| 3 months | not published | +3.3% | not published | 3.1% | not published | +19.9 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +11.2% | not published | 8.2% | not published | +18.1 pts |
| Since launch ACRT Aug 2026 · TLA Feb 2026 | −8.7% | +10.4% | 0.0% | 11.1% | 0.0 pts | +26.3 pts |
ACRT and TLA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACRT and TLA on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACRT in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACRT paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −8.7%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned −8.7% over the same days, so a holder was about even.
TLA in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, TLA paid 11.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 1.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.4%. Tesla (TSLA) returned −15.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 26.3 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 18.4%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 4% of the distribution paid Jun 5, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACRT against TLA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-tla
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACRT against TLA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-tla Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACRT against TLA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-tla
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACRT against TLA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-tla
- Markdown
- [ACRT against TLA (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-tla)