Data as of .
ACQQ vs DYLG: which paid, and which earned it?
ACQQ and DYLG both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACQQ and DYLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ACQQ | Only in DYLG |
|---|---|
| NDX100 35% VOLATILITY AUTOCALLABLE SWAP 100.00% | GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 10.88% |
| CATERPILLAR INC 9.35% | |
| MICROSOFT CORP 5.70% | |
| AMGEN INC 4.46% | |
| UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 4.35% | |
| TRAVELERS COS INC/THE 4.33% | |
| VISA INC-CLASS A SHARES 4.25% | |
| ALPHABET INC-CL A 4.04% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACQQ | DYLG | ACQQ | DYLG | ACQQ | DYLG | |
| 3 months | not published | +1.9% | not published | 0.8% | not published | +1.5 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +13.0% | not published | 2.1% | not published | −0.9 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +13.8% | not published | 9.5% | not published | +0.3 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +47.0% | not published | 30.8% | not published | −9.8 pts |
| Since launch | −2.1% | +44.7% | 0.0% | 30.7% | −0.8 pts | −8.3 pts |
| ACQQ ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF Option income on QQQ | DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF Covered call on DIA, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | ProShares | Global X |
| Strategy | option income | covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) |
| Pays | not established | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | not published | 3.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.35% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | 9.5% |
| Price change, 1 year | −2.1% | +3.5% |
| Total return, 1 year | −2.1% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | +13.8% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −1.3% | +13.5% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.8 pts | +0.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 59% |
| Age | 35 days | 1150 days |
| Net assets | $23m | $6m |
ACQQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACQQ paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −2.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned −1.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.8 pts.
DYLG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DYLG paid 9.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.8%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +13.5% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 3.1%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 59% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, ACQQ or DYLG?
- ACQQ charges 0.72% a year and DYLG charges 0.35%, so DYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACQQ against DYLG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-dylg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.