Data as of .
DYLG vs QLDY: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year QLDY paid 29.2% of its price in cash against DYLG’s 9.5%, though DYLG returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: DYLG scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYLG and QLDY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in DYLG | Only in QLDY |
|---|---|
| GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 10.88% | Ndx 12/18/2026 2001.44 C 94.80% |
| CATERPILLAR INC 9.35% | First American Government Obligations Fu 4.77% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 5.70% | United States Treasury Note/bond 2.375% 0.53% |
| AMGEN INC 4.46% | Ndxp Us 09/21/26 P29500 0.08% |
| UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 4.35% | Xnd 12/18/2026 10.44 C 0.05% |
| TRAVELERS COS INC/THE 4.33% | Cash & Other -0.06% |
| VISA INC-CLASS A SHARES 4.25% | Nasdaq-1 Put Opt 09/26 29650 -0.16% |
| ALPHABET INC-CL A 4.04% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DYLG | QLDY | DYLG | QLDY | DYLG | QLDY | |
| 3 months | +1.9% | −6.6% | 0.8% | 8.3% | +1.5 pts | −4.1 pts |
| 6 months | +13.0% | +20.1% | 2.1% | 18.7% | −0.9 pts | −4.2 pts |
| 1 year | +13.8% | +10.6% | 9.5% | 29.2% | +0.3 pts | −11.2 pts |
| 3 years | +47.0% | not published | 30.8% | not published | −9.8 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +44.7% | +10.6% | 30.7% | 29.2% | −8.3 pts | −11.2 pts |
| DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF Covered call on DIA, paying monthly | QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread(TM) Income ETF Option income on QQQ, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | Defiance |
| Strategy | covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 3.1% | 19.6% |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 1.04% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 9.5% | 29.2% |
| Price change, 1 year | +3.5% | −20.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.8% | +10.6% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +13.5% | +21.8% |
| Ahead or behind | +0.3 pts | −11.2 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 59% | 100% |
| Age | 1150 days | 365 days |
| Net assets | $6m | $52m |
DYLG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DYLG paid 9.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.8%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +13.5% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 3.1%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 59% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
QLDY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QLDY paid 29.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 20.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.6%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.6%, paid weekly. Defiance estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, DYLG or QLDY?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DYLG paid 9.5% of its starting price in cash and QLDY paid 29.2%, so QLDY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, DYLG or QLDY?
- With every distribution reinvested, DYLG returned +13.8% and QLDY returned +10.6% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so DYLG returned more.
- Which is cheaper, DYLG or QLDY?
- DYLG charges 0.35% a year and QLDY charges 1.04%, so DYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYLG against QLDY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dylg-vs-qldy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.