Which paid more, DYLG or QDTY?

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DYLG paid 9.2% of its starting price in cash and QDTY paid 30.7%, so QDTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, DYLG or QDTY?

With every distribution reinvested, DYLG returned +14.8% and QDTY +10.1% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.

Which is cheaper, DYLG or QDTY?

DYLG charges 0.35% a year and QDTY charges 1.17%, so DYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Income ETFs

DYLG vs QDTY: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QDTY paid 30.7% of its price in cash against DYLG’s 9.2%, though DYLG returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DYLG and QDTY

Net assets: $4.8m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF, and $37m on Nov 3, 2026 for YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF.

DYLG on its own →QDTY on its own →

At a glance

9.2%

DYLG cash paid, 1 year

30.7%

QDTY cash paid, 1 year

+14.8%

DYLG total return, 1 year

+10.1%

QDTY total return, 1 year

DYLG · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 Not measured

DYLG

+14.8%

none

Not measured

DYLG over 1 year: paid 9.2%, price +4.7%, total +14.8%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

DYLG

+14.8%

9.2% of it arrived as cash

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

DYLG over 1 year: paid 9.2%, price +4.7%, total +14.8%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

DYLG

+14.8%

9.2% cash

9.2% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. DYLG over 1 year: paid 9.2%, price +4.7%, total +14.8%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QDTY · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 2.2 pts behind QQQ

QDTY

+10.1%

QQQ

+12.3%

2.2 pts behind QQQ

QDTY over 1 year: paid 30.7%, price −21.9%, total +10.1%, QQQ +12.3%, −2.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QDTY

+10.1%

30.7% of it arrived as cash

2.2 pts behind QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.2 pts behind QQQ

QDTY over 1 year: paid 30.7%, price −21.9%, total +10.1%, QQQ +12.3%, −2.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QDTY

+10.1%

30.7% as cash

2.2 pts behind QQQ

30.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QDTY over 1 year: paid 30.7%, price −21.9%, total +10.1%, QQQ +12.3%, −2.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

DYLG costs 0.82 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.7 points; QDTY is 6.0 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

DYLG vs QDTY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	DYLG	QDTY
Paid and earned
Measure	DYLG	QDTY
Total return, 1 year	+14.8%	+10.1%
Price change, 1 year	rose 4.7%	fell 21.9%
Return of capital, issuer estimate	32% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment	75% of the Nov 5, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Measure	DYLG	QDTY
Benchmark	not published	Nasdaq-100, measured through QQQ
Cost and size
Measure	DYLG	QDTY
Expense ratio	0.35%	1.17%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026	$4.8m	$29m
Holdings
Measure	DYLG	QDTY
Holdings in common	0%

Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, DYLG and QDTY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DYLG QDTY

Only in one fund ↓

Only in DYLG

THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. 11.60%

CATERPILLAR INC. 9.28%

MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.29%

UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED 4.72%

AMGEN INC. 4.39%

The Travelers Companies, Inc. 4.26%

VISA INC. 4.17%

ALPHABET INC. 4.05%

Only in QDTY

NDX 12/18/2026 1001.26 C 95.10%

XND 12/18/2026 10.02 C 0.73%

United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.375% 09/15/2027 0.05%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF · Covered call, paying monthly QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF · 0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly

Issuer Global X YieldMax

Strategy covered call 0DTE covered call

Benchmark none Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)

Pays monthly weekly

Payout rate, annualized 4.0% 30.9%

Expense ratio 0.35% 1.17%

Cash paid, 1 year 9.2% 30.7%

Price change, 1 year +4.7% −21.9%

Total return, 1 year +14.8% +10.1%

Benchmark return, 1 year not published +12.3%

Ahead or behind not available −2.2 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate 32% 75%

Age 3.3 years 1.7 years

Net assets, DYLG as of Oct 12, 2026 and QDTY as of Nov 3, 2026 $4.8m $37m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: DYLG vs QDTY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	DYLG	QDTY	DYLG	QDTY	DYLG	QDTY
3 months	−0.1%	−2.6%	0.8%	7.4%	not measured	+0.8 pts
6 months	+8.2%	+0.6%	1.8%	15.2%	not measured	+1.0 pts
1 year	+14.8%	+10.1%	9.2%	30.7%	not measured	−2.2 pts
3 years	+53.4%	–	31.6%	–	not measured	–
Since launchNot the same days: DYLG Jul 2023 · QDTY Feb 2025	+49.0%	+21.7%	31.3%	45.1%	not measured	−8.5 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

DYLG

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DYLG paid 9.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.8%. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.0%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 32% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

QDTY

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QDTY paid 30.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 21.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 30.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 75% of the distribution paid Nov 5, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, DYLG or QDTY?: Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DYLG paid 9.2% of its starting price in cash and QDTY paid 30.7%, so QDTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, DYLG or QDTY?: With every distribution reinvested, DYLG returned +14.8% and QDTY +10.1% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, DYLG or QDTY?: DYLG charges 0.35% a year and QDTY charges 1.17%, so DYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

DYLG vs QLDY DYLG vs QRMI DYLG vs KIQQ DYLG vs QDTE QDTY vs ODTE QDTY vs TPAY QDTY vs QQDH QDTY vs RECI

Where to next

Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) →All income ETFs ranked by the Distribution Coverage Score →How the scores are computed →DYLG on its own →QDTY on its own →DYLG dividend history →DYLG holdings →QDTY dividend history →QDTY holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

DYLG filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

DYLG prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

DYLG 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Global X page for DYLG ↗

QDTY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

QDTY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

QDTY 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

YieldMax page for QDTY ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DYLG against QDTY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dylg-vs-qdty

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.