Data as of .
DYLG vs OMAH: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year OMAH paid 14.4% of its price in cash against DYLG’s 9.5%, though DYLG returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: DYLG scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYLG and OMAH hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DYLG | OMAH |
|---|---|---|
| ALPHABET INC-CL A | 4.04% | 4.57% |
| APPLE INC | 3.88% | 10.59% |
| AMERICAN EXPRESS CO | 3.60% | 6.57% |
| CHEVRON CORP | 2.42% | 4.75% |
| COCA-COLA CO/THE | 1.02% | 4.94% |
| Only in DYLG | Only in OMAH |
|---|---|
| GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 10.88% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22% |
| CATERPILLAR INC 9.35% | VeriSign Inc 4.90% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 5.70% | Kroger Co/The 4.79% |
| AMGEN INC 4.46% | DAVITA INC 4.75% |
| UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 4.35% | Occidental Petroleum Corp 4.64% |
| TRAVELERS COS INC/THE 4.33% | Alphabet Inc 4.54% |
| VISA INC-CLASS A SHARES 4.25% | Chubb Ltd 4.49% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 4.04% | Kraft Heinz Co/The 4.46% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DYLG | OMAH | DYLG | OMAH | DYLG | OMAH | |
| 3 months | +1.9% | +1.7% | 0.8% | 3.7% | +1.5 pts | −2.4 pts |
| 6 months | +13.0% | +8.8% | 2.1% | 7.7% | −0.9 pts | +2.8 pts |
| 1 year | +13.8% | +8.8% | 9.5% | 14.4% | +0.3 pts | +4.9 pts |
| 3 years | +47.0% | not published | 30.8% | not published | −9.8 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +44.7% | +14.6% | 30.7% | 21.4% | −8.3 pts | +12.4 pts |
| DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF Covered call on DIA, paying monthly | OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | VistaShares |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 3.1% | 15.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.98% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 9.5% | 14.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | +3.5% | −6.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.8% | +8.8% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +13.5% | +3.9% |
| Ahead or behind | +0.3 pts | +4.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 59% | not published |
| Age | 1150 days | 562 days |
| Net assets | $6m | $1.1bn |
DYLG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DYLG paid 9.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.8%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +13.5% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 3.1%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 59% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, DYLG or OMAH?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DYLG paid 9.5% of its starting price in cash and OMAH paid 14.4%, so OMAH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, DYLG or OMAH?
- With every distribution reinvested, DYLG returned +13.8% and OMAH returned +8.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so DYLG returned more.
- Which is cheaper, DYLG or OMAH?
- DYLG charges 0.35% a year and OMAH charges 0.98%, so DYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYLG against OMAH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dylg-vs-omah Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.