Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QDTY vs QUSA: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QDTY paid 30.9% of its price in cash against QUSA’s 13.8%, and returned more with it reinvested.

YieldMax(R) Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF and VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF.

30.9%QDTY cash paid, 1 year
13.8%QUSA cash paid, 1 year
+20.2%QDTY total return, 1 year
+3.5%QUSA total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QDTY scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QDTY 37QUSA 21.43.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QDTY1.6 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QDTY+20.2%30.9% of it arrived as cash1.6 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QDTY+20.2%30.9% as cash1.6 pts behind QQQ
QUSA11.7 pts behind QUAL · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QUAL+15.2%QUSA+3.5%13.8% cash11.7 pts behind QUALTotal return, distributions reinvestedQUAL+15.2%QUSA+3.5%11.7 pts behind QUAL

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QDTY and QUSA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in QDTYOnly in QUSA
NDX 12/18/2026 1001.26 C 96.19%Microsoft Corp 6.08%
XND 12/18/2026 10.02 C 3.21%Apple Inc 5.99%
First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 0.53%NVIDIA Corp 5.78%
United States Treasury Bill 10/15/2026 0.07%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 5.35%
Caterpillar Inc 4.91%
Broadcom Inc 4.70%
Costco Wholesale Corp 4.40%
Coca-Cola Co/The 4.33%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QDTY and QUSA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QDTYQUSAQDTYQUSAQDTYQUSA
3 months−0.9%−1.9%7.9%3.6%+1.6 pts−3.6 pts
6 months+20.7%+10.4%17.3%7.8%−3.6 pts−4.3 pts
1 year+20.2%+3.5%30.9%13.8%−1.6 pts−11.7 pts
Since launch+27.1%+4.9%42.0%15.1%−8.5 pts−25.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QDTY and QUSA on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QDTY
YieldMax(R) Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
QUSA
VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF
Covered call on QUAL, paying monthly
IssuerYieldMaxVistaShares
Strategy0DTE covered callcovered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized25.9%15.3%
Expense ratio1.17%0.97%
Cash paid, 1 year30.9%13.8%
Price change, 1 year−14.0%−11.0%
Total return, 1 year+20.2%+3.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+15.2%
Ahead or behind−1.6 pts−11.7 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate94%not published
Age582 days500 days
Net assets$27m$22m

QDTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTY paid 30.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 14.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

QUSA in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QUSA paid 13.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 11.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.5%. USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy returned +15.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QDTY or QUSA?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTY paid 30.9% of its starting price in cash and QUSA paid 13.8%, so QDTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QDTY or QUSA?
With every distribution reinvested, QDTY returned +20.2% and QUSA returned +3.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QDTY returned more.
Which is cheaper, QDTY or QUSA?
QDTY charges 1.17% a year and QUSA charges 0.97%, so QUSA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QDTY against QUSA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QDTY against QUSA, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qdty-vs-qusa Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources