Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ACQQ vs KIQQ: which paid, and which earned it?

ACQQ and KIQQ both write options for income.

ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF and KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF.

0.0%ACQQ cash paid, 1 year
5.8%KIQQ cash paid, 1 year
−2.1%ACQQ total return, 1 year
+6.0%KIQQ total return, 1 year
ACQQ0.8 pts behind QQQ · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ−1.3%ACQQ−2.1%0.8 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ−1.3%ACQQ−2.1%0.8 pts behind QQQ
KIQQ9.9 pts behind QQQ · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+15.9%KIQQ+6.0%5.8% of it arrived as cash9.9 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+15.9%KIQQ+6.0%9.9 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACQQ and KIQQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in ACQQOnly in KIQQ
NDX100 35% VOLATILITY AUTOCALLABLE SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00%+NDXDBHIO/-FED FUNDS 100.58%
NVIDIA CORP 8.90%
APPLE INC 8.20%
MICROSOFT CORP 6.17%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 5.14%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.50%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 4.21%
ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.40%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

ACQQ and KIQQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
ACQQKIQQACQQKIQQACQQKIQQ
3 monthsnot published−3.2%not published1.9%not published−0.7 pts
6 monthsnot published+11.9%not published4.5%not published−12.3 pts
Since launch−2.1%+6.0%0.0%5.8%−0.8 pts−9.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ACQQ and KIQQ on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACQQ
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF
Option income on QQQ
KIQQ
KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF
Buffer with income on QQQ, paying monthly
IssuerProSharesKraneShares
Strategyoption incomebuffer with income
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysnot establishedmonthly
Payout rate, annualizednot published6.3%
Expense ratio0.72%0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)5.8% (since launch on Jan 7, 2026)
Price change, 1 year−2.1%−0.1%
Total return, 1 year−2.1% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)+6.0% (since launch on Jan 7, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year−1.3%+15.9%
Ahead or behind−0.8 pts−9.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age35 days254 days
Net assets$23m$3m

ACQQ in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACQQ paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −2.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned −1.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.8 pts.

KIQQ in plain words

Over the period since launch on Jan 7, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, KIQQ paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.0%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +15.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACQQ or KIQQ?
ACQQ charges 0.72% a year and KIQQ charges 0.79%, so ACQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACQQ against KIQQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACQQ against KIQQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-kiqq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources