ACBE vs ANV: which paid, and which earned it?
ACBE and ANV both write options for income. Pacer Metaurus Enhanced Core Income Autocallable ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF.
About even with SPY
ACBE since launch: paid 0.6%, price +0.1%, total +0.7%, SPY +0.9%, −0.2 pts.
SPY
+0.9%
ACBE
+0.7%
about even with SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with SPY
ACBE since launch: paid 0.6%, price +0.1%, total +0.7%, SPY +0.9%, −0.2 pts.
SPY
+0.9%
ACBE
+0.7%
about even with SPY
0.6% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBE since launch: paid 0.6%, price +0.1%, total +0.7%, SPY +0.9%, −0.2 pts.
13.8 pts behind NVDA
ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
NVDA
+26.9%
ANV
+13.2%
9.5% of it arrived as cash
13.8 pts behind NVDA
Total return, distributions reinvested
13.8 pts behind NVDA
ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
NVDA
+26.9%
ANV
+13.2%
13.8 pts behind NVDA
9.5% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +26.9%. ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACBE | ANV | ACBE | ANV | ACBE | ANV |
| 3 months | not published | +5.3% | not published | 2.5% | not published | −10.4 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +11.1% | not published | 6.8% | not published | −19.2 pts |
| Since launch ACBE Sep 2026 · ANV Feb 2026 | +0.7% | +13.2% | 0.6% | 9.5% | −0.2 pts | −13.8 pts |
ACBE and ANV over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACBE and ANV on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACBE in plain words
Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACBE paid 0.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.7%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.9%, paid periodically.
ANV in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ANV paid 9.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.2%. NVIDIA (NVDA) returned +26.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.8 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.9%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 5% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACBE against ANV, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-anv
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACBE against ANV, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-anv Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACBE against ANV, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-anv
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACBE against ANV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-anv
- Markdown
- [ACBE against ANV (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-anv)