Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsOpen in the appaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

ACBE vs MPIM: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+5.7 pts
1 month to Nov 12, 2026: ACBE ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.10 pts
A year: ACBE 0.60%, MPIM 0.70%, per filings dated Aug 7, 2026 and Aug 24, 2026
Overlap
–
No book read for both funds
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

ACBE costs 0.10 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

ACBE vs MPIM: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureACBEMPIM
Paid and earned
Price changefell 2.5% (since Sep 10, 2026)fell 12.8% (since Aug 12, 2026)
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkS&P 500, measured through SPYnot published
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.60%0.70%
Net assets$3.6mnot read by ETFIQ
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Key numbers
1.4%
ACBE cash paid, since launch, Sep 10, 2026
3.0%
MPIM cash paid, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
−1.0%
ACBE total return, since launch, Sep 10, 2026
−10.0%
MPIM total return, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
ACBE · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 1.2 pts behind SPY
ACBE
−1.0%
SPY
+0.2%

1.2 pts behind SPY

ACBE since launch: paid 1.4%, price −2.5%, total −1.0%, SPY +0.2%, −1.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SPY

+0.2%

ACBE

−1.0%

1.2 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.2 pts behind SPY

ACBE since launch: paid 1.4%, price −2.5%, total −1.0%, SPY +0.2%, −1.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SPY

+0.2%

ACBE

−1.0%

1.2 pts behind SPY

1.4% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBE since launch: paid 1.4%, price −2.5%, total −1.0%, SPY +0.2%, −1.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.
MPIM · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured
MPIM
−10.0%
none

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

3.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

ACBE Pacer Metaurus Enhanced Core Income Autocallable ETF · Autocallable on SPY MPIM m+ Income Momentum Autocall ETF · Autocallable
Issuer Pacer m+
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) not set
Pays not established not established
Payout rate, annualized 10.4% 17.0%
Expense ratio 0.60% 0.70%
Cash paid, 1 year 1.4% (since launch, Sep 10, 2026) 3.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)
Price change, 1 year −2.5% (since launch, Sep 10, 2026) −12.8% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)
Total return, 1 year −1.0% (since launch, Sep 10, 2026) −10.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year +0.2% (since launch, Sep 10, 2026) not published
Ahead or behind −1.2 pts (since launch, Sep 10, 2026) not available
Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published
Age 63 days 92 days
Net assets $3.6m not read by ETFIQ

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: ACBE vs MPIM: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACBEMPIMACBEMPIMACBEMPIM
3 months–−10.6%–3.0%–not measured
Since launchNot the same days: ACBE Sep 2026 · MPIM Aug 2026−1.0%−10.0%1.4%3.0%−1.2 ptsnot measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

ACBE flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ACBE

Over the period from its first trade on Sep 10, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, ACBE paid 1.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +0.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.2 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.4%, paid periodically.

MPIM

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 12, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, MPIM paid 3.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −10.0%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.0%, paid periodically.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACBE or MPIM?
ACBE charges 0.60% a year and MPIM charges 0.70%, so ACBE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACBE against MPIM, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-mpim

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

ACBE and MPIM both write options for income.

Growth of 100

ACBE and MPIM

Total return, distributions reinvested, 1 month.

ACBE −3.7%MPIM −9.4%
Oct 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

ACBE −3.7%, MPIM −9.4%: ACBE +5.7 pts ahead, 1 month, Oct 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.