ACBE vs ATC: which paid, and which earned it?

ACBE and ATC both write options for income. Pacer Metaurus Enhanced Core Income Autocallable ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable COIN ETF.

0.6%
ACBE cash paid, since launch
10.8%
ATC cash paid, since launch
+0.7%
ACBE total return, since launch
+14.8%
ATC total return, since launch
ACBE · since launch to Sep 30, 2026About even with SPY
ACBE
+0.7%
SPY
+0.9%

About even with SPY

ACBE since launch: paid 0.6%, price +0.1%, total +0.7%, SPY +0.9%, −0.2 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBE

+0.7%

about even with SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with SPY

ACBE since launch: paid 0.6%, price +0.1%, total +0.7%, SPY +0.9%, −0.2 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBE

+0.7%

about even with SPY

0.6% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBE since launch: paid 0.6%, price +0.1%, total +0.7%, SPY +0.9%, −0.2 pts.

ATC · since launch to Sep 30, 202625 pts ahead of COIN
ATC
+14.8%
COIN
−10.2%

25 pts ahead of COIN

ATC since launch: paid 10.8%, price +1.9%, total +14.8%, COIN −10.2%, +25.0 pts.

COIN

−10.2%

ATC

+14.8%

10.8% of it arrived as cash

25 pts ahead of COIN

Total return, distributions reinvested

25 pts ahead of COIN

ATC since launch: paid 10.8%, price +1.9%, total +14.8%, COIN −10.2%, +25.0 pts.

COIN

−10.2%

ATC

+14.8%

25 pts ahead of COIN

10.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +14.8%. ATC since launch: paid 10.8%, price +1.9%, total +14.8%, COIN −10.2%, +25.0 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACBEATCACBEATCACBEATC
3 monthsnot published+23.3%not published6.2%not published+6.2 pts
Since launch
ACBE Sep 2026 · ATC May 2026
+0.7%+14.8%0.6%10.8%−0.2 pts+25.0 pts

ACBE and ATC over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACBE
Pacer Metaurus Enhanced Core Income Autocallable ETF · Autocallable on SPY
ATC
GraniteShares Autocallable COIN ETF · Autocallable on COIN, paying monthly
Issuer Pacer GraniteShares
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy Coinbase (COIN)
Pays not established monthly
Payout rate, annualized 6.9% 36.1%
Expense ratio 0.60% 1.07%
Cash paid, 1 year 0.6% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) 10.8% (since launch on May 12, 2026)
Price change, 1 year +0.1% +1.9%
Total return, 1 year +0.7% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) +14.8% (since launch on May 12, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year +0.9% −10.2%
Ahead or behind −0.2 pts +25.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 2%
Age 20 days 141 days
Net assets $3m $998,712

ACBE and ATC on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACBE in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACBE paid 0.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.7%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.9%, paid periodically.

ATC in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 12, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ATC paid 10.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.8%. Coinbase (COIN) returned −10.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 25.0 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 36.1%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 2% of the distribution paid Aug 14, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACBE or ATC?
ACBE charges 0.60% a year and ATC charges 1.07%, so ACBE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACBE against ATC, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-atc

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.