ACBE vs APRH: which paid, and which earned it?

ACBE and APRH both write options for income. Pacer Metaurus Enhanced Core Income Autocallable ETF and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF -- April.

0.6%
ACBE cash paid, since launch
6.4%
APRH cash paid, 1 year
+0.7%
ACBE total return, since launch
+6.7%
APRH total return, 1 year
ACBE · since launch to Sep 30, 2026About even with SPY
ACBE
+0.7%
SPY
+0.9%

About even with SPY

ACBE since launch: paid 0.6%, price +0.1%, total +0.7%, SPY +0.9%, −0.2 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBE

+0.7%

about even with SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with SPY

ACBE since launch: paid 0.6%, price +0.1%, total +0.7%, SPY +0.9%, −0.2 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBE

+0.7%

about even with SPY

0.6% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBE since launch: paid 0.6%, price +0.1%, total +0.7%, SPY +0.9%, −0.2 pts.

APRH · 1 year to Sep 30, 20269.1 pts behind SPY
APRH
+6.7%
SPY
+15.7%

9.1 pts behind SPY

APRH over 1 year: paid 6.4%, price +0.1%, total +6.7%, SPY +15.7%, −9.1 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

APRH

+6.7%

6.4% of it arrived as cash

9.1 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

9.1 pts behind SPY

APRH over 1 year: paid 6.4%, price +0.1%, total +6.7%, SPY +15.7%, −9.1 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

APRH

+6.7%

9.1 pts behind SPY

6.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +15.7%. APRH over 1 year: paid 6.4%, price +0.1%, total +6.7%, SPY +15.7%, −9.1 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACBEAPRHACBEAPRHACBEAPRH
3 monthsnot published+1.4%not published2.1%not published−1.1 pts
6 monthsnot published+5.2%not published4.3%not published−11.8 pts
1 yearnot published+6.7%not published6.4%not published−9.1 pts
3 yearsnot published+23.3%not published20.3%not published−61.7 pts
Since launch
ACBE Sep 2026 · APRH Apr 2023
+0.7%+28.7%0.6%24.3%−0.2 pts−65.1 pts

ACBE and APRH over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACBE
Pacer Metaurus Enhanced Core Income Autocallable ETF · Autocallable on SPY
APRH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF -- April · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
Issuer Pacer Innovator
Strategy autocallable defined income
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays not established quarterly
Payout rate, annualized 6.9% 8.4%
Expense ratio 0.60% 0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year 0.6% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) 6.4%
Price change, 1 year +0.1% +0.1%
Total return, 1 year +0.7% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) +6.7%
Benchmark return, 1 year +0.9% +15.7%
Ahead or behind −0.2 pts −9.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published
Age 20 days 1276 days
Net assets $3m $25m

ACBE and APRH on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACBE in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACBE paid 0.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.7%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.9%, paid periodically.

APRH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, APRH paid 6.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +15.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.1 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.4%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACBE or APRH?
ACBE charges 0.60% a year and APRH charges 0.79%, so ACBE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACBE against APRH, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-aprh

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.