Which paid more, APRH or JULJ?

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, APRH paid 6.4% of its starting price in cash and JULJ paid 5.6%, so APRH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, APRH or JULJ?

With every distribution reinvested, APRH returned +6.8% and JULJ +5.4% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.

Which is cheaper, APRH or JULJ?

APRH and JULJ both charge 0.79% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Income ETFs

APRH vs JULJ: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, APRH paid 6.4% of its price in cash against JULJ’s 5.6%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about APRH and JULJ

Net assets: $25m on Nov 3, 2026 for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF -- April, and $14m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July.

APRH on its own →JULJ on its own →

At a glance

6.4%

APRH cash paid, 1 year

5.6%

JULJ cash paid, 1 year

+6.8%

APRH total return, 1 year

+5.4%

JULJ total return, 1 year

APRH · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 8 pts behind SPY

APRH

+6.8%

SPY

+14.8%

8 pts behind SPY

APRH over 1 year: paid 6.4%, price +0.2%, total +6.8%, SPY +14.8%, −8.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

APRH

+6.8%

6.4% of it arrived as cash

8 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

8 pts behind SPY

APRH over 1 year: paid 6.4%, price +0.2%, total +6.8%, SPY +14.8%, −8.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

APRH

+6.8%

8 pts behind SPY

6.4% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. APRH over 1 year: paid 6.4%, price +0.2%, total +6.8%, SPY +14.8%, −8.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

JULJ · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 9.4 pts behind SPY

JULJ

+5.4%

SPY

+14.8%

9.4 pts behind SPY

JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.6%, price −0.4%, total +5.4%, SPY +14.8%, −9.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JULJ

+5.4%

5.6% of it arrived as cash

9.4 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

9.4 pts behind SPY

JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.6%, price −0.4%, total +5.4%, SPY +14.8%, −9.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JULJ

+5.4%

9.4 pts behind SPY

5.6% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.6%, price −0.4%, total +5.4%, SPY +14.8%, −9.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.79% a year; their one-year returns differ by 1.4 points; APRH is 1.8 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

APRH vs JULJ: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	APRH	JULJ
Paid and earned
Measure	APRH	JULJ
Total return, 1 year	+6.8%	+5.4%
Price change, 1 year	rose 0.2%	fell 0.4%
Return of capital, issuer estimate	65% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment	39% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Measure	APRH	JULJ
Benchmark	S&P 500, measured through SPY	S&P 500, measured through SPY
Against its benchmark, same days	behind by 8.0 pts	behind by 9.4 pts
Cost and size
Measure	APRH	JULJ
Expense ratio	0.79%	0.79%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026	$25m	$14m
Holdings
Measure	APRH	JULJ
Holdings in common	0%

ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · APRH scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?

IQ Income Score62.6APRH54.2JULJ

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

APRH 62.6

JULJ 54.2

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, APRH and JULJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

APRH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF -- April · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly JULJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly

Issuer Innovator Innovator

Strategy defined income defined income

Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) S&P 500 (SPY)

Pays quarterly quarterly

Payout rate, annualized 8.4% 5.4%

Expense ratio 0.79% 0.79%

Cash paid, 1 year 6.4% 5.6%

Price change, 1 year +0.2% −0.4%

Total return, 1 year +6.8% +5.4%

Benchmark return, 1 year +14.8% +14.8%

Ahead or behind −8.0 pts −9.4 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate 65% 39%

Age 3.6 years 3.3 years

Net assets, APRH as of Nov 3, 2026 and JULJ as of Nov 4, 2026 $25m $14m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: APRH vs JULJ: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	APRH	JULJ	APRH	JULJ	APRH	JULJ
3 months	+1.1%	+1.3%	2.1%	1.3%	+1.2 pts	+1.5 pts
6 months	+2.9%	+2.6%	4.1%	2.7%	−2.1 pts	−2.4 pts
1 year	+6.8%	+5.4%	6.4%	5.6%	−8.0 pts	−9.4 pts
3 years	+22.4%	+18.6%	20.1%	17.3%	−60.5 pts	−64.3 pts
Since launchNot the same days: APRH Apr 2023 · JULJ Jul 2023	+29.2%	+21.3%	24.3%	19.0%	−65.7 pts	−58.5 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

APRH

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, APRH paid 6.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 8.0 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.4%, paid quarterly. Innovator estimates that 65% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

JULJ

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JULJ paid 5.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.4%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.4%, paid quarterly. Innovator estimates that 39% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, APRH or JULJ?: Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, APRH paid 6.4% of its starting price in cash and JULJ paid 5.6%, so APRH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, APRH or JULJ?: With every distribution reinvested, APRH returned +6.8% and JULJ +5.4% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, APRH or JULJ?: APRH and JULJ both charge 0.79% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

APRH vs JANH APRH vs JULH APRH vs APRJ APRH vs BIGY JULJ vs QUSA JULJ vs SCLZ JULJ vs SPUT JULJ vs OCTH

Where to next

S&P 500 (SPY) →APRH on its own →JULJ on its own →APRH dividend history →JULJ dividend history →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

APRH and JULJ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

APRH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

APRH 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Innovator page for APRH ↗

JULJ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

JULJ 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Innovator page for JULJ ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, APRH against JULJ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/aprh-vs-julj

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.