ACBE vs AHD: which paid, and which earned it?

ACBE and AHD both write options for income. Pacer Metaurus Enhanced Core Income Autocallable ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable HOOD ETF.

0.6%
ACBE cash paid, since launch
10.1%
AHD cash paid, since launch
+0.7%
ACBE total return, since launch
+17.7%
AHD total return, since launch
ACBE · since launch to Sep 30, 2026About even with SPY
ACBE
+0.7%
SPY
+0.9%

About even with SPY

ACBE since launch: paid 0.6%, price +0.1%, total +0.7%, SPY +0.9%, −0.2 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBE

+0.7%

about even with SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with SPY

ACBE since launch: paid 0.6%, price +0.1%, total +0.7%, SPY +0.9%, −0.2 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBE

+0.7%

about even with SPY

0.6% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBE since launch: paid 0.6%, price +0.1%, total +0.7%, SPY +0.9%, −0.2 pts.

AHD · since launch to Sep 30, 202634 pts behind HOOD
AHD
+17.7%
HOOD
+51.7%

34 pts behind HOOD

AHD since launch: paid 10.1%, price +6.9%, total +17.7%, HOOD +51.7%, −34.0 pts.

HOOD

+51.7%

AHD

+17.7%

10.1% as cash

34 pts behind HOOD

Total return, distributions reinvested

34 pts behind HOOD

AHD since launch: paid 10.1%, price +6.9%, total +17.7%, HOOD +51.7%, −34.0 pts.

HOOD

+51.7%

AHD

+17.7%

34 pts behind HOOD

10.1% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +51.7%. AHD since launch: paid 10.1%, price +6.9%, total +17.7%, HOOD +51.7%, −34.0 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACBEAHDACBEAHDACBEAHD
3 monthsnot published+9.1%not published5.1%not published+5.5 pts
Since launch
ACBE Sep 2026 · AHD May 2026
+0.7%+17.7%0.6%10.1%−0.2 pts−34.0 pts

ACBE and AHD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACBE
Pacer Metaurus Enhanced Core Income Autocallable ETF · Autocallable on SPY
AHD
GraniteShares Autocallable HOOD ETF · Autocallable on HOOD, paying monthly
Issuer Pacer GraniteShares
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy Robinhood (HOOD)
Pays not established monthly
Payout rate, annualized 6.9% 32.6%
Expense ratio 0.60% 1.07%
Cash paid, 1 year 0.6% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) 10.1% (since launch on May 19, 2026)
Price change, 1 year +0.1% +6.9%
Total return, 1 year +0.7% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) +17.7% (since launch on May 19, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year +0.9% +51.7%
Ahead or behind −0.2 pts −34.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 17%
Age 20 days 134 days
Net assets $3m $3m

ACBE and AHD on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACBE in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACBE paid 0.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.7%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.9%, paid periodically.

AHD in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 19, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, AHD paid 10.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.7%. Robinhood (HOOD) returned +51.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 34.0 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 32.6%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 17% of the distribution paid Aug 14, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACBE or AHD?
ACBE charges 0.60% a year and AHD charges 1.07%, so ACBE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACBE against AHD, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-ahd

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.