AHD vs APRH: which paid, and which earned it?

AHD and APRH both write options for income. GraniteShares Autocallable HOOD ETF and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF -- April.

10.1%
AHD cash paid, since launch
6.4%
APRH cash paid, 1 year
+17.7%
AHD total return, since launch
+6.7%
APRH total return, 1 year
AHD · since launch to Sep 30, 202634 pts behind HOOD
AHD
+17.7%
HOOD
+51.7%

34 pts behind HOOD

AHD since launch: paid 10.1%, price +6.9%, total +17.7%, HOOD +51.7%, −34.0 pts.

HOOD

+51.7%

AHD

+17.7%

10.1% as cash

34 pts behind HOOD

Total return, distributions reinvested

34 pts behind HOOD

AHD since launch: paid 10.1%, price +6.9%, total +17.7%, HOOD +51.7%, −34.0 pts.

HOOD

+51.7%

AHD

+17.7%

34 pts behind HOOD

10.1% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. AHD since launch: paid 10.1%, price +6.9%, total +17.7%, HOOD +51.7%, −34.0 pts.

APRH · 1 year to Sep 30, 20269.1 pts behind SPY
APRH
+6.7%
SPY
+15.7%

9.1 pts behind SPY

APRH over 1 year: paid 6.4%, price +0.1%, total +6.7%, SPY +15.7%, −9.1 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

APRH

+6.7%

6.4% cash

9.1 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

9.1 pts behind SPY

APRH over 1 year: paid 6.4%, price +0.1%, total +6.7%, SPY +15.7%, −9.1 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

APRH

+6.7%

9.1 pts behind SPY

6.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +51.7%. APRH over 1 year: paid 6.4%, price +0.1%, total +6.7%, SPY +15.7%, −9.1 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowAHDAPRHAHDAPRHAHDAPRH
3 months+9.1%+1.4%5.1%2.1%+5.5 pts−1.1 pts
6 monthsnot published+5.2%not published4.3%not published−11.8 pts
1 yearnot published+6.7%not published6.4%not published−9.1 pts
3 yearsnot published+23.3%not published20.3%not published−61.7 pts
Since launch
AHD May 2026 · APRH Apr 2023
+17.7%+28.7%10.1%24.3%−34.0 pts−65.1 pts

AHD and APRH over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

AHD
GraniteShares Autocallable HOOD ETF · Autocallable on HOOD, paying monthly
APRH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF -- April · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
Issuer GraniteShares Innovator
Strategy autocallable defined income
Benchmark Robinhood (HOOD) S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays monthly quarterly
Payout rate, annualized 32.6% 8.4%
Expense ratio 1.07% 0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year 10.1% (since launch on May 19, 2026) 6.4%
Price change, 1 year +6.9% +0.1%
Total return, 1 year +17.7% (since launch on May 19, 2026) +6.7%
Benchmark return, 1 year +51.7% +15.7%
Ahead or behind −34.0 pts −9.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 17% not published
Age 134 days 1276 days
Net assets $3m $25m

AHD and APRH on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

AHD in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 19, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, AHD paid 10.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.7%. Robinhood (HOOD) returned +51.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 34.0 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 32.6%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 17% of the distribution paid Aug 14, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

APRH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, APRH paid 6.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +15.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.1 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.4%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, AHD or APRH?
AHD charges 1.07% a year and APRH charges 0.79%, so APRH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, AHD against APRH, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ahd-vs-aprh

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.