ANV vs JULJ: which paid, and which earned it?
ANV and JULJ both write options for income. GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July.
13.8 pts behind NVDA
ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
NVDA
+26.9%
ANV
+13.2%
9.5% of it arrived as cash
13.8 pts behind NVDA
Total return, distributions reinvested
13.8 pts behind NVDA
ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
NVDA
+26.9%
ANV
+13.2%
13.8 pts behind NVDA
9.5% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
10.6 pts behind SPY
JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.7%, price −0.7%, total +5.1%, SPY +15.7%, −10.6 pts.
SPY
+15.7%
JULJ
+5.1%
5.7% as cash
10.6 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
10.6 pts behind SPY
JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.7%, price −0.7%, total +5.1%, SPY +15.7%, −10.6 pts.
SPY
+15.7%
JULJ
+5.1%
10.6 pts behind SPY
5.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +26.9%. JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.7%, price −0.7%, total +5.1%, SPY +15.7%, −10.6 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ANV | JULJ | ANV | JULJ | ANV | JULJ |
| 3 months | +5.3% | +1.6% | 2.5% | 1.4% | −10.4 pts | −0.9 pts |
| 6 months | +11.1% | +2.8% | 6.8% | 2.7% | −19.2 pts | −14.2 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +5.1% | not published | 5.7% | not published | −10.6 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +19.3% | not published | 17.4% | not published | −65.7 pts |
| Since launch ANV Feb 2026 · JULJ Jul 2023 | +13.2% | +20.6% | 9.5% | 19.0% | −13.8 pts | −58.2 pts |
ANV and JULJ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ANV and JULJ on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ANV in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ANV paid 9.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.2%. NVIDIA (NVDA) returned +26.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.8 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.9%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 5% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
JULJ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, JULJ paid 5.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +15.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.6 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.4%, paid quarterly.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ANV against JULJ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-julj
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ANV against JULJ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-julj Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ANV against JULJ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-julj
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ANV against JULJ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-julj
- Markdown
- [ANV against JULJ (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-julj)