ANV vs JULH: which paid, and which earned it?
ANV and JULH both write options for income. GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July.
13.8 pts behind NVDA
ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
NVDA
+26.9%
ANV
+13.2%
9.5% of it arrived as cash
13.8 pts behind NVDA
Total return, distributions reinvested
13.8 pts behind NVDA
ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
NVDA
+26.9%
ANV
+13.2%
13.8 pts behind NVDA
9.5% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
11.2 pts behind SPY
JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price −0.4%, total +4.5%, SPY +15.7%, −11.2 pts.
SPY
+15.7%
JULH
+4.5%
4.8% as cash
11.2 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
11.2 pts behind SPY
JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price −0.4%, total +4.5%, SPY +15.7%, −11.2 pts.
SPY
+15.7%
JULH
+4.5%
11.2 pts behind SPY
4.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +26.9%. JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price −0.4%, total +4.5%, SPY +15.7%, −11.2 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ANV | JULH | ANV | JULH | ANV | JULH |
| 3 months | +5.3% | +2.0% | 2.5% | 1.6% | −10.4 pts | −0.5 pts |
| 6 months | +11.1% | +3.6% | 6.8% | 2.7% | −19.2 pts | −13.4 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +4.5% | not published | 4.8% | not published | −11.2 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +21.9% | not published | 18.6% | not published | −63.0 pts |
| Since launch ANV Feb 2026 · JULH Jul 2023 | +13.2% | +22.9% | 9.5% | 20.3% | −13.8 pts | −55.9 pts |
ANV and JULH over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ANV and JULH on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ANV in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ANV paid 9.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.2%. NVIDIA (NVDA) returned +26.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.8 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.9%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 5% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
JULH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, JULH paid 4.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +15.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.2 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.6%, paid quarterly.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ANV against JULH, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-julh
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ANV against JULH, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-julh Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ANV against JULH, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-julh
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ANV against JULH. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-julh
- Markdown
- [ANV against JULH (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-julh)