Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

URA vs VOO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, URA returned −30.3% to VOO's +13.7%, and VOO charges 0.03% to URA's 0.69%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about URA and VOO

Net assets: $5.4bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Uranium ETF, and $1.0tn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF.

At a glance
−30.3%
URA total return, 1 year
+13.7%
VOO total return, 1 year
0.69%
URA expense ratio
0.03%
VOO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VOO costs 0.66 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 44.0 points.

URA vs VOO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureURAVOO
Return
Total return, 1 year−30.3%+13.7%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high58.4%, high on Feb 2, 2011
Against its benchmark
What it tracksNuclear and uraniumS&P 500 Index
Against its benchmark, 1 yearbehind by 43.7 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.69%0.03%
Net assets, URA as of Oct 12, 2026 and VOO as of Sep 30, 2026$5.4bn$1.0tn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund63%39.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 12, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 832 weekly returns
URA VOO
Return
Total return edge VOO −51.4% +746.3%
Annualized edge VOO −4.4% +14.3%
Price return edge VOO −68.7% +536.1%
Risk
Volatility edge VOO 36.8% 15.9%
Max drawdown edge VOO −93.2% −31.8%
Downside capture 127.6% 99.9%
Beta 1.31 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VOO 0.02 0.82
Sortino edge VOO 0.02 1.19
Treynor 0.005 0.134
Calmar edge VOO −0.05 0.45
Against the benchmark
Alpha −11.7% a year 0.0% a year
Alpha t-stat −1.54 0.51
Information ratio −0.29 0.02
Tracking error 30.7% 0.4%

Each against its own benchmark: URA against ACWI, Nov 12, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026; VOO against IVV, Sep 17, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VOO returned more: +746.3% to −51.4%. VOO swung less: 15.9% to 36.8%. VOO fell less at its worst: −31.8% to −93.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: URA vs VOO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureURAVOOEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return−51.4%+746.3%VOOPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized−4.4%+14.3%VOOTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−68.7%+536.1%VOOPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility36.8%15.9%VOOSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation25.0%11.0%VOOLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−93.2%−31.8%VOODeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture120.6%99.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture127.6%99.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.311.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.321.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.020.82VOOReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.021.19VOOReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0050.134Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar−0.050.45VOOAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkACWIIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−11.7% a year0.0% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−1.540.51Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−26.6% to +3.2%−0.1% to +0.2%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.290.02Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error30.7%0.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 832 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, URA and VOO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first URA VOO
Only in one fund ↓
Only in URA
CAMECO CORPORATION 22.18%
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust 6.74%
Oklo Inc 6.09%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD. 6.07%
URANIUM ENERGY CORP. 4.81%
Joint stock company National atomic company Kazatomprom 4.40%
CENTRUS ENERGY CORP. 3.46%
PALADIN ENERGY LTD 3.14%
Only in VOO
NVIDIA Corp 8.40%
Apple Inc 7.39%
Microsoft Corp 5.79%
Amazon.com Inc 3.72%
Alphabet Inc 3.07%
Broadcom Inc 2.54%
Alphabet Inc 2.46%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.43%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

URA Global X Uranium ETF VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Where it sits Thematic ETF Stock ETF
What it is Nuclear and uranium Tracks the S&P 500
Total return, 1 year −30.3% +13.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.4% (ACWI) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark −43.7 pts vs ACWI 0.0 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.69% 0.03%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 99.7%
Holdings 57 507
Net assets, URA as of Oct 12, 2026 and VOO as of Sep 30, 2026 $5.4bn $1.0tn

URA and VOO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-ED5116147B

URA and VOO do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. URA follows Nuclear and uranium and VOO follows S&P 500 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 URA returned −30.3% and VOO +13.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 44.0 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
URA

By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 63% of the fund across 57 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −30.3% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 43.7 pts. It sits 58.4% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.

VOO

VOO tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 507 positions, with the top ten at 39.1%.

Questions people ask

Are URA and VOO in the same category?
URA is a thematic ETF and VOO is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, URA or VOO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, URA returned −30.3% and VOO +13.7%.
Which is cheaper, URA or VOO?
VOO is cheaper, by 0.66 percentage points a year. That is about $66 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do URA and VOO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of URA and 100% of VOO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, URA against VOO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ura-vs-voo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.