Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
SCHG vs URA: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, SCHG returned +5.9% to URA's −31.0%, and SCHG charges 0.04% to URA's 0.69%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about SCHG and URA
Net assets: $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF, and $5.4bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Uranium ETF.
Pair scorecard
SCHG costs 0.65 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 36.9 points.
| Measure | SCHG | URA |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +5.9% | −31.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 6.0%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Below its all-time high | 62.8%, high on Feb 2, 2011 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index | Nuclear and uranium |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 46.0 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.69% |
| Net assets, SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 and URA as of Oct 12, 2026 | $63.0bn | $5.4bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 51.0% | 63% |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, SCHG and URA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
SCHG and URA on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHG
SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +5.9% with distributions reinvested, against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 6.0% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Nov 4, 2026.
URA
By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 63% of the fund across 57 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 46.0 pts. It sits 62.8% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.
Questions people ask
- Are SCHG and URA in the same category?
- SCHG is a stock ETF and URA is a thematic ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, SCHG or URA?
- In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHG returned +5.9% and URA −31.0%.
- Which is cheaper, SCHG or URA?
- SCHG is cheaper, by 0.65 percentage points a year. That is about $65 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, SCHG against URA, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schg-vs-ura
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). SCHG against URA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schg-vs-ura
[SCHG against URA (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schg-vs-ura)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.