Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
NLR vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, NLR returned −35.8% to SCHG's +6.8%, and SCHG charges 0.04% to NLR's 0.52%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about NLR and SCHG
Net assets: $3.1bn on Oct 26, 2026 for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF, and $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
SCHG costs 0.48 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 42.6 points.
| Measure | NLR | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −35.8% | +6.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 41.6%, high on Jan 28, 2026 | |
| Below its high | 3.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Nuclear and uranium | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 49.2 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.52% | 0.04% |
| Net assets, NLR as of Oct 26, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 | $3.1bn | $63.0bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 61% | 51.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, NLR and SCHG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
NLR and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
NLR
By weight, 15% of NLR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 25 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −35.8% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 49.2 pts. It sits 41.6% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.
SCHG
SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are NLR and SCHG in the same category?
- NLR is a thematic ETF and SCHG is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, NLR or SCHG?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NLR returned −35.8% and SCHG +6.8%.
- Which is cheaper, NLR or SCHG?
- SCHG is cheaper, by 0.48 percentage points a year. That is about $48 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, NLR against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nlr-vs-schg
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). NLR against SCHG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nlr-vs-schg
[NLR against SCHG (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nlr-vs-schg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.