Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
QTUM vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QTUM returned +20.3% to SCHG's +5.9%, and SCHG charges 0.04% to QTUM's 0.40%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about QTUM and SCHG
Net assets: $4.9bn on Nov 3, 2026 for Defiance Quantum ETF, and $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
SCHG costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.4 points.
| Measure | QTUM | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +20.3% | +5.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 22.3%, high on Jun 2, 2026 | |
| Below its high | 6.0%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Quantum computing | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.40% | 0.04% |
| Net assets, QTUM as of Nov 3, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 | $4.9bn | $63.0bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 82% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 13% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 18% | 51.0% |
Risk and return
Sep 14, 2018 to Oct 30, 2026 · 424 weekly returnsFrom Sep 2018 to Oct 2026, QTUM returned more: +479.1% to +253.6%. SCHG swung less: 21.9% to 26.3%. SCHG fell less at its worst: −34.2% to −38.1%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | QTUM | SCHG | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +479.1% | +253.6% | QTUM | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +24.0% | +16.8% | QTUM | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +440.5% | +236.4% | QTUM | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 26.3% | 21.9% | SCHG | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 17.6% | 14.7% | SCHG | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −38.1% | −34.2% | SCHG | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.85 | 0.69 | QTUM | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.26 | 1.03 | QTUM | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.63 | 0.49 | QTUM | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 424 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, QTUM and SCHG hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
13% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
QTUM and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
QTUM
By weight, 38% of QTUM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 82%. The top ten holdings are 18% of the fund across 85 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +20.3% with distributions reinvested. It sits 22.3% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
SCHG
SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +5.9% with distributions reinvested, against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 6.0% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Nov 4, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are QTUM and SCHG in the same category?
- QTUM is a thematic ETF and SCHG is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, QTUM or SCHG?
- In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QTUM returned +20.3% and SCHG +5.9%.
- Which is cheaper, QTUM or SCHG?
- SCHG is cheaper, by 0.36 percentage points a year. That is about $36 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, QTUM against SCHG, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qtum-vs-schg
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). QTUM against SCHG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qtum-vs-schg
[QTUM against SCHG (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qtum-vs-schg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.