Data as of Sep 14, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
QTUM vs SCHG: how they differ
Over the year QTUM returned more, +45.1% against +12.6%, and SCHG charges 0.04% against 0.40%.
Defiance Quantum ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QTUM and SCHG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in QTUM | Only in SCHG |
|---|---|
| Arqit Quantum Inc 1.82% | NVIDIA Corp 11.02% |
| Global Unichip Corp 1.82% | Apple Inc 9.84% |
| Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd 1.81% | Microsoft Corp 7.18% |
| Cloudflare Inc 1.66% | Amazon.com Inc 5.68% |
| Elastic Nv 1.63% | Alphabet Inc 4.76% |
| Snowflake Inc 1.63% | Broadcom Inc 4.55% |
| Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co 1.62% | Tesla Inc 3.92% |
| Nutanix Inc 1.58% | Alphabet Inc 3.78% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 14, 2026.
| QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Thematic ETF | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Defiance | Schwab |
| What it is | Quantum computing | U.S. Large-Cap Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +45.1% | +12.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.0% | +17.0% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +28.0 pts | −4.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.40% | 0.04% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 34.8% | 95.4% |
| Holdings | 89 | 193 |
QTUM in plain words
By weight, 35% of QTUM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 83%. The top ten holdings are 17% of the fund across 89 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 14, 2026. Over the year to Sep 14, 2026 the fund returned +45.1% with distributions reinvested against +17.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 28.0 pts. It sits 15.2% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
SCHG in plain words
SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 14, 2026 it returned +12.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.0% for the S&P 500 and +21.5% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, QTUM or SCHG?
- In the year to Sep 14, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QTUM returned +45.1% and SCHG returned +12.6%, so QTUM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, QTUM or SCHG?
- QTUM charges 0.40% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do QTUM and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 35% of QTUM and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
- Are QTUM and SCHG the same kind of fund?
- No. QTUM is a thematic ETF and SCHG is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QTUM against SCHG, data as of Sep 14, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qtum-vs-schg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources