Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
QQQ vs QTUM: how they differ
Over the year QTUM returned more, +50.4% against +23.0%, and QQQ charges 0.18% against 0.40%.
Invesco QQQ Trust and Defiance Quantum ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QQQ and QTUM hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | QQQ | QTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Palantir Technologies Inc | 1.69% | 1.53% |
| Microsoft Corp | 5.89% | 1.48% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.65% | 1.36% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 4.90% | 1.30% |
| NVIDIA Corp | 8.52% | 1.30% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 4.36% | 1.28% |
| Broadcom Inc | 2.75% | 1.16% |
| Intel Corp | 2.24% | 1.14% |
| Alphabet Inc | 3.12% | 1.13% |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 1.88% | 1.12% |
| Lam Research Corp | 1.66% | 1.10% |
| Applied Materials Inc | 1.60% | 1.09% |
| Only in QQQ | Only in QTUM |
|---|---|
| Apple Inc 7.72% | Arqit Quantum Inc 1.82% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.07% | Global Unichip Corp 1.82% |
| Tesla Inc 2.92% | Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd 1.81% |
| Alphabet Inc 2.90% | Cloudflare Inc 1.66% |
| Walmart Inc 2.29% | Elastic Nv 1.63% |
| Costco Wholesale Corp 1.78% | Snowflake Inc 1.63% |
| Netflix Inc 1.42% | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co 1.62% |
| Space Exploration Technologies Corp 1.26% | Nutanix Inc 1.58% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026 and Sep 14, 2026.
| QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust | QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Thematic ETF |
| Issuer | Invesco | Defiance |
| What it is | Nasdaq-100 | Quantum computing |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.0% | +50.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +5.5 pts | +32.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.40% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 96.7% | 34.8% |
| Holdings | 105 | 89 |
QQQ in plain words
QQQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 47.0%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
QTUM in plain words
By weight, 35% of QTUM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 83%. The top ten holdings are 17% of the fund across 89 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 14, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +50.4% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 32.9 pts. It sits 12.5% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, QQQ or QTUM?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQ returned +23.0% and QTUM returned +50.4%, so QTUM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, QQQ or QTUM?
- QQQ charges 0.18% a year and QTUM charges 0.40%, so QQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do QQQ and QTUM overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 97% of QQQ and 35% of QTUM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 23% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
- Are QQQ and QTUM the same kind of fund?
- No. QQQ is an index ETF and QTUM is a thematic ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQ against QTUM, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qqq-vs-qtum Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources