Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
NLR vs VTI: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, NLR returned −35.8% to VTI's +13.5%, and VTI charges 0.03% to NLR's 0.52%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about NLR and VTI
Net assets: $3.1bn on Oct 26, 2026 for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF, and $689.2bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF.
Pair scorecard
VTI costs 0.49 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 49.3 points.
| Measure | NLR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −35.8% | +13.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 41.6%, high on Jan 28, 2026 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Nuclear and uranium | Morningstar US Total Market Index |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 49.2 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.52% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, NLR as of Oct 26, 2026 and VTI as of Sep 30, 2026 | $3.1bn | $689.2bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 61% | 34.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Aug 24, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,000 weekly returnsVTI returned more: +617.4% to +50.2%. VTI swung less: 18.6% to 25.0%. VTI fell less at its worst: −54.8% to −62.9%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | NLR | VTI | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +50.2% | +617.4% | VTI | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +2.1% | +10.8% | VTI | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −23.5% | +408.0% | VTI | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 25.0% | 18.6% | VTI | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 17.9% | 13.1% | VTI | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −62.9% | −54.8% | VTI | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.15 | 0.57 | VTI | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.21 | 0.80 | VTI | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.03 | 0.20 | VTI | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,000 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, NLR and VTI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
NLR and VTI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
NLR and VTI do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. NLR follows Nuclear and uranium and VTI follows Morningstar US Total Market Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 NLR returned −35.8% and VTI +13.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 49.3 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
NLR
By weight, 15% of NLR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 25 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −35.8% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 49.2 pts. It sits 41.6% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.
VTI
VTI tracks an index of US total market. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3,521 positions, with the top ten at 34.7%.
Questions people ask
- Are NLR and VTI in the same category?
- NLR is a thematic ETF and VTI is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, NLR or VTI?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NLR returned −35.8% and VTI +13.5%.
- Which is cheaper, NLR or VTI?
- VTI is cheaper, by 0.49 percentage points a year. That is about $49 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, NLR against VTI, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nlr-vs-vti
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). NLR against VTI. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nlr-vs-vti
[NLR against VTI (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nlr-vs-vti)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.