Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
NLR vs VOO: how they differ
Over the year VOO returned more, +17.6% against −6.1%, and VOO charges 0.03% against 0.52%.
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF and Vanguard 500 Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, NLR and VOO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in NLR | Only in VOO |
|---|---|
| Constellation Energy Corp 9.09% | NVIDIA Corp 7.53% |
| Cameco Corp 7.90% | Apple Inc 6.61% |
| Fortum Oyj 6.83% | Microsoft Corp 4.31% |
| Public Service Enterprise Group Inc 6.22% | Amazon.com Inc 3.63% |
| Nexgen Energy Ltd 5.30% | Alphabet Inc 3.26% |
| Bwx Technologies Inc 5.21% | Broadcom Inc 2.78% |
| Paladin Energy Ltd 5.21% | Alphabet Inc 2.60% |
| Uranium Energy Corp 5.07% | Micron Technology Inc 2.02% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | VOO Vanguard 500 Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Thematic ETF | Core index fund |
| Issuer | VanEck | Vanguard |
| What it is | Nuclear and uranium | S&P 500 |
| Total return, 1 year | −6.1% | +17.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −23.6 pts | +0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.52% | 0.03% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 15.3% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 25 | 506 |
NLR in plain words
By weight, 15% of NLR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 25 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned −6.1% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 23.6 pts. It sits 31.1% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.
VOO in plain words
VOO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 36.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, NLR or VOO?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NLR returned −6.1% and VOO returned +17.6%, so VOO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, NLR or VOO?
- NLR charges 0.52% a year and VOO charges 0.03%, so VOO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do NLR and VOO overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 15% of NLR and 100% of VOO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
- Are NLR and VOO the same kind of fund?
- No. NLR is a thematic ETF and VOO is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, NLR against VOO, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nlr-vs-voo Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources