Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

NLR vs VOO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, NLR returned −35.8% to VOO's +13.7%, and VOO charges 0.03% to NLR's 0.52%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about NLR and VOO

Net assets: $3.1bn on Oct 26, 2026 for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF, and $1.0tn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF.

At a glance
−35.8%
NLR total return, 1 year
+13.7%
VOO total return, 1 year
0.52%
NLR expense ratio
0.03%
VOO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VOO costs 0.49 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 49.5 points.

NLR vs VOO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureNLRVOO
Return
Total return, 1 year−35.8%+13.7%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high41.6%, high on Jan 28, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksNuclear and uraniumS&P 500 Index
Against its benchmark, 1 yearbehind by 49.2 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.52%0.03%
Net assets, NLR as of Oct 26, 2026 and VOO as of Sep 30, 2026$3.1bn$1.0tn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund61%39.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Sep 17, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 840 weekly returns
NLR VOO
Return
Total return edge VOO +153.2% +804.0%
Annualized edge VOO +5.9% +14.6%
Price return edge VOO +45.4% +575.9%
Risk
Volatility edge VOO 22.3% 15.9%
Max drawdown edge VOO −45.9% −31.8%
Downside capture 96.4% 99.9%
Beta 0.99 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VOO 0.30 0.84
Sortino edge VOO 0.43 1.22
Treynor 0.046 0.134
Calmar edge VOO 0.13 0.46
Against the benchmark
Alpha −3.5% a year 0.0% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.90 0.51
Information ratio −0.22 0.02
Tracking error 16.7% 0.4%

Each against its own benchmark: NLR against ACWI, Apr 4, 2008 to Oct 23, 2026; VOO against IVV, Sep 17, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VOO returned more: +804.0% to +153.2%. VOO swung less: 15.9% to 22.3%. VOO fell less at its worst: −31.8% to −45.9%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: NLR vs VOO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureNLRVOOEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+153.2%+804.0%VOOPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+5.9%+14.6%VOOTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+45.4%+575.9%VOOPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.3%15.9%VOOSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.5%10.9%VOOLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−45.9%−31.8%VOODeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture79.1%99.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture96.4%99.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.991.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.541.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.300.84VOOReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.431.22VOOReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0460.134Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.130.46VOOAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkACWIIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−3.5% a year0.0% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.900.51Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−11.1% to +4.1%−0.1% to +0.2%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.220.02Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error16.7%0.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 840 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, NLR and VOO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first NLR VOO
Constellation Energy Corp 8.04% 0.13%
Public Service Enterprise Group Inc 7.09% 0.05%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in NLR
Cameco Corp 8.41%
BWX Technologies Inc 6.78%
Fortum Oyj 5.75%
Oklo Inc 5.22%
Centrus Energy Corp 5.05%
Uranium Energy Corp 4.99%
NexGen Energy Ltd 4.97%
Denison Mines Corp 4.77%
Only in VOO
NVIDIA Corp 8.40%
Apple Inc 7.39%
Microsoft Corp 5.79%
Amazon.com Inc 3.72%
Alphabet Inc 3.07%
Broadcom Inc 2.54%
Alphabet Inc 2.46%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.43%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Where it sits Thematic ETF Stock ETF
What it is Nuclear and uranium Tracks the S&P 500
Total return, 1 year −35.8% +13.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.4% (ACWI) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark −49.2 pts vs ACWI 0.0 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.52% 0.03%
Already in the S&P 500 15.1% 99.7%
Holdings 25 507
Net assets, NLR as of Oct 26, 2026 and VOO as of Sep 30, 2026 $3.1bn $1.0tn

NLR and VOO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-9BD3259417

NLR and VOO do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. NLR follows Nuclear and uranium and VOO follows S&P 500 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 NLR returned −35.8% and VOO +13.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 49.5 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

NLR flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
NLR

By weight, 15% of NLR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 25 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −35.8% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 49.2 pts. It sits 41.6% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.

VOO

VOO tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 507 positions, with the top ten at 39.1%.

Questions people ask

Are NLR and VOO in the same category?
NLR is a thematic ETF and VOO is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, NLR or VOO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NLR returned −35.8% and VOO +13.7%.
Which is cheaper, NLR or VOO?
VOO is cheaper, by 0.49 percentage points a year. That is about $49 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do NLR and VOO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 15% of NLR and 100% of VOO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, NLR against VOO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nlr-vs-voo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.